Advanced Search

Urology Coding Alert

Reader Question:

Modifier 59: Ensure Separate Site of Service Before Appending

Published on Wed Oct 19, 2011

Question: I have an insurance company that is not paying for a code, stating it is bundled into another code. We are billing 52353, 52352-59, and 52332-59. My doctor is doing a cystourethroscopy with ureterscopy and/or pyeloscopy with a holmium laser lithotripsy. He is then doing a basket extraction of multiple stone fragments, not just irrigating the stones out. Then he is placing a stent in the ureter. The insurance company is saying the 52352 is part of 52353. My doctor is saying this is a different procedure though it is the same anatomical site. I haven't had any problems billing this way with at least three other major insurance companies, but now one payer is denying my claims. Is that payer correct to deny the claim?Washington D.C. SubscriberAnswer: The payer is correct. As you know, the Correct Coding Initiative (CCI) bundles 52352 (Cystourethroscopy, with ureteroscopy and/or pyeloscopy; with removal [...]
You’ve reached your limit of free articles. Already a subscriber? Log in.
Not a subscriber? Subscribe today to continue reading this article. Plus, you’ll get:
  • Simple explanations of current healthcare regulations and payer programs
  • Real-world reporting scenarios solved by our expert coders
  • Industry news, such as MAC and RAC activities, the OIG Work Plan, and CERT reports
  • Instant access to every article ever published in Revenue Cycle Insider
  • 6 annual AAPC-approved CEUs
  • The latest updates for CPT®, ICD-10-CM, HCPCS Level II, NCCI edits, modifiers, compliance, technology, practice management, and more

Other Articles in this issue of

Urology Coding Alert

View All