Colorado Subscriber
Answer: You can count the information in the assessment as a condition status update. The physician may organize the notes in any manner he finds practical. For instance, he may update the illness(es) in the assessment section, rather than in the HPI at the top of the note, although for audit purposes it may be helpful to reference them in the HPI section, too. However, it is important that it be clearly identifiable that the chronic conditions are updated.
Keep in mind that the physician must mention the status of the condition, such as "Hypertension, stable. Continue medications as prescribed," rather than just listing the condition on the assessment.
Using the 1997 guidelines may help you report higher-level services for patients who have chronic conditions, such as hypertension and diabetes, which affect treatment plans. Unlike the 1995 version, the 1997 history elements don't require the four elements of HPI for an extended level of HPI because you can use the status of three or more chronic conditions. Therefore, the 1997 guidelines may allow you to report a higher-level E/M code for encounters that involve periodic prescrip-tion renewals without the physician having to go into as much detail.
Keep in mind that you cannot mix components of the 1995 and 1997 guidelines -- you must pick one and stick to it throughout the chart.
Remember: Medical necessity must ultimately drive the visit's history and examination levels. Recently some carriers have also included the policy of reporting the presence and status of three chronic conditions as part of the HPI for the 1995 guidelines. As always, check with the specific carrier for details of this possible update.