Urology Coding Alert
Reader Question:
Follow CMS Regs on Documentation Amendments
Published on Tue May 14, 2013
You’ve reached your limit of free articles. Already a subscriber? Log in.
Not a subscriber? Subscribe today to continue reading this article. Plus, you’ll get:
Other Articles in this issue of
Urology Coding Alert
- Case Study:
Don't Let 'Stent' Confusion Sabotage Your Endourology Claims
Hint: You can’t report 52332 whenever your urologist places a ‘stent.’ Stent placement is routine [...] - Radiology 101:
Watch for Urinary Tract Pathology Exception With Ultrasound Coding
Other limited anatomical reviews won’t support 76770 coding, however. More and more urologists are beginning [...] - Anatomy Basics:
Picture Urologic Anatomy for Better Coding
As a urology coder, you know that urologic radiology focuses on the urinary system. Major [...] - Medically Unlikely Edits:
Get to the Bottom of MUE Limitations - And Know When to Fight Back
Bust the myth that you can’t appeal MUE denials. In the Urology Coding Alert Vol. [...] - You Be the Coder:
Called Into the OR? 99251-99255 May Not Apply
Question: How should I code the following procedure:
[...] - Reader Question:
Choose 11420 vs. 54050 Series Based on Lesion Type
Question: I have a question regarding removal of a penile lesion. I’m not sure which [...] - Reader Question:
Equate 'Submeatal Stenosis' with Stricture
Question: When my urologist documents “cysto with dilatation of submeatal stenosis,” what code(s) should I [...] - Reader Question:
There Is More Than 1 Way to Document
Question: My urologist reported an established patient office visit code 99214, but the only note [...] - Reader Question:
Follow CMS Regs on Documentation Amendments
Question: Where can I find CMS directions regarding amending documentation?
Georgia Subscriber Answer: [...]
View All
