Advanced Search

Urology Coding Alert

Reader Question:

Don't Code 'Standing Order' Urinalysis Tests

Published on Sun Jul 15, 2012

Question: I just read the Urology Coding Alert article "81001-81003? The Order May Clinch the Auditor's Decision." I have a question about standing orders. For example, if a group is using an EMR, and a urinalysis is almost standard. Over 90 percent of the patients get an UA (81001). The results are entered in the required fields setup in the EMR. The physician acknowledges he reviewed under microscope, indicates his findings, and the results are scanned into the system. What I see to be incorrect is there is no actual order for the UA. Because this group considers this a continuity of care, an order is never obtained. Is a "standing order" applicable/legal? Michigan Subscriber Answer: Standing orders are never acceptable for ordering a test. An order should be available for each performed and ordered test. The rule: Diagnostic tests always require an order for the test based on clinical [...]
You’ve reached your limit of free articles. Already a subscriber? Log in.
Not a subscriber? Subscribe today to continue reading this article. Plus, you’ll get:
  • Simple explanations of current healthcare regulations and payer programs
  • Real-world reporting scenarios solved by our expert coders
  • Industry news, such as MAC and RAC activities, the OIG Work Plan, and CERT reports
  • Instant access to every article ever published in Revenue Cycle Insider
  • 6 annual AAPC-approved CEUs
  • The latest updates for CPT®, ICD-10-CM, HCPCS Level II, NCCI edits, modifiers, compliance, technology, practice management, and more

Other Articles in this issue of

Urology Coding Alert

View All