Urology Coding Alert

News You Can Use:

Don't Expect CMS to Update 'New Patient' Determination Based on Subspecialty

In other news: You can still avoid additional e-scribe penalties. As many veteran coders are aware, just because CPT Codes makes a change, you aren't guaranteed to see Medicare follow suit. That's the case with the latest "new versus established" patient definition that CPT® 2012 published, which won't have much impact on Part B claims, CMS reps said during a Jan. 24 Open Door Forum. Background: CPT® 2012 states, "A new patient is one who has not received any professional services from the physician or another physician of the exact same specialty and subspecialty who belongs to the same group practice, within the past three years." The portions of the description that are new for 2012 are underlined. What wasn't clear to many practices was that many payers -- including Medicare -- don't acknowledge subspecialty designations in their computer systems, making the new definition irrelevant. "CMS claims processing systems do not recognize [...]
You’ve reached your limit of free articles. Already a subscriber? Log in.
Not a subscriber? Subscribe today to continue reading this article. Plus, you’ll get:
  • Simple explanations of current healthcare regulations and payer programs
  • Real-world reporting scenarios solved by our expert coders
  • Industry news, such as MAC and RAC activities, the OIG Work Plan, and CERT reports
  • Instant access to every article ever published in Revenue Cycle Insider
  • 6 annual AAPC-approved CEUs
  • The latest updates for CPT®, ICD-10-CM, HCPCS Level II, NCCI edits, modifiers, compliance, technology, practice management, and more

Other Articles in this issue of

Urology Coding Alert

View All