Pointer: Correct your claims if you realize you have been doing it wrong. Now that you have read about when you can and can't break the latest Correct Coding Initiative (CCI) bundles using a modifier in "Include I&D, Skin Suture Procedures With Your Urological Surgery Codes, Thanks to CCI 18.3", you should make sure you know how to properly use modifier 59 (Distinct procedural service) on your claims. Payers are still scrutinizing submissions for separate and distinct services, thanks to the OIG's reported error rates relating to modifier 59 use. But you can avoid these coding errors and prevent possible paybacks by using these two tips. Tip 1: Determine Separate Regions Pull a sample of your modifier 59 submissions and verify that the claims properly represent a distinct procedural service. Fifteen percent of the OIG's audited claims using modifier 59 had procedures that weren't distinct because "they were performed at the same session, same anatomical site, and/or through the same incision," says Daniel R. Levinson, inspector general, in "Use of Modifier 59 to Bypass Medicare's Correct Coding Initiative Edits," an article posted on the OIG Web site www.oig.hhs.gov/oei/reports/oei-03-02-00771.pdf. Rule of thumb: Example: If you don't put modifier 59 on 50650 (to change it to 50650 -59) to bypass the bundling edit between 50548 and 50650, your payers will consider the ureterectomy part of the nephrectomy if they apply Medicare's bundling edits. To be paid for both procedures you may use modifier 59 because these procedures represent two separate procedures on two separate anatomical parts of the urinary tract. The intravesical ureterectomy is an open abdominal procedure that represents a separate and distinct operative incision/approach involving the lower urinary tract while the initial surgery is a laparoscopic total nephroureterectomy involving the kidney and retroperitoneal ureter, the upper urinary tract. Both procedures are needed to ensure the highest cure rate for this type of malignant tumor. Tip 2: Put 59 on the Secondary Code Notice how the example above includes appending modifier 59 to the secondary code (50650). The Correct Coding Initiative publishes a list of comprehensive/component edits consisting of two codes (procedures) that cannot reasonably be performed together based on the code definitions or anatomic considerations, experts say. Each edit consists of a column 1 and column 2 code. Review: Close call: Example: You submit the coding: The error? The claim incorrectly appends modifier 59 to the comprehensive or column 1 code (52240) instead of the component or column 2 code (52204). Action: Your corrected claim should look like this: Bonus: