Urology Coding Alert

Following advice from industry leaders will set your providers up for success.

“If it isn’t documented, it didn’t happen” is one of the mantras of coding. That makes your urologists’ documentation the key to accurate coding, and in turn, reimbursement. But that’s not all. Clinical documentation also supports clinical outcomes, protects in malpractices cases, and tells the patient’s medical story.

Don’t let poor recordkeeping mangle your patients’ outcomes or your practice’s earned reimbursement. Brush up on these pointers from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) and the National Committee for Quality Assurance (NCQA).

Follow these tips: Efficient medical recordkeeping facilitates patient management as well as current and future medical treatment. As NCQA says, “Consistent, current, and complete documentation in the medical record is an essential component of quality patient care.” Let’s take a closer look at each of these key elements and how they can help you build a foundation for better documentation.

Tip 1: Strive for Consistency

Institute a checklist of basic requirements and ensure that everyone making entries in the medical record knows and follows the list. Get started with the checklist for your practice by perusing the following six core components of flawless medical record documentation, according to NCQA:

• Significant illnesses and medical conditions are indicated on the problem list.
• Medication allergies and adverse reactions are prominently noted in the record. If the patient has no known allergies (NKA) or history of adverse reactions, this is appropriately noted in the record.
• Past medical history (for patients seen three or more times) is easily identified and includes serious accidents, operations, and illnesses. For children and adolescents (18 years and younger), past medical history relates to prenatal care, birth, operations, and childhood illnesses.
• Working diagnoses are consistent with findings.
• Treatment plans are consistent with diagnoses.
• There is no evidence that the patient is placed at inappropriate risk by a diagnostic or therapeutic procedure.

See the full NCQA guidelines at www.ncqa.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/20180110_Guidelines_Medical_Record_Documentation.pdf.

Be accountable: One way to make sure everyone complies with the checklist is to turn on the function in your EHR that allows you to view the author of a note “by entry, not by the entire chart,” says Laurie Bouzarelos, MHA, CPC, founder and owner of Provider Solutions Consulting in Centennial, Colorado.

“In most audited charts, there is no indication of who is entering the items in the medical record,” Bouzarelos notes. By turning on this function and using it consistently, you can be sure the author of a note — whether it be a physician, nurse, medical assistant, or scribe — is accountable and meets the standards for documentation.

Using this functionality will help to ensure uniformity across all charts. Plus, it’s consistent with one of the NCQA guidelines suggesting that “all entries in the medical record contain the author’s identification. Author identification may be a handwritten signature, unique electronic identifier, or initials.”

Be comprehensive: In addition to the six NCQA core elements, “notes should also include information about follow-up care, calls, or visits, if applicable. The specific timeframe for all of these should be noted in weeks or months, or as needed,” Bouzarelos suggests. Take another step toward consistency by creating a template for documenting subsequent care and correspondence information.

Tip 2: Watch the Time

A lack of timely signoff on the medical record is “a significant, common problem,” Bouzarelos adds. In her audits, she has found signoffs that range from zero to 58 days, with one audit of 24 charts showing a nine-day average. “Plenty of things can be forgotten or misrepresented over this period of time,” Bouzarelos cautions. That leaves practices open to problems down the road, whether it be with the provision of quality medical care or problems with payment.

Medicare: This echoes the sentiments of CMS, whose guidance notes that “the service should be documented during, or as soon as practicable after it is provided, in order to maintain an accurate medical record” (Medicare Claims Processing Manual Chapter 12, Section 30.6.1(A)).

Although CMS guidelines do not set a specific time frame for signing off, local Medicare administrative contractors (MACs) “have offered their own interpretation of what this means,” notes Kent Moore, senior strategist for physician payment at the American Academy of Family Physicians. For instance, Wisconsin Physicians Service Insurance Corporation Government Health Administrators (WPS GHA), the MAC for Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Michigan, Missouri, and Nebraska, “support [the CMS] concept for all documentation and would offer a reasonable time frame of 24 to 48 hours,” according to Moore (www.wpsgha.com/wps/portal/mac/site/claims/guides-and-resources/completion-of-documentation/).

State: You should also check out your state’s requirements and guidance for the timely authentication of medical record documentation, as some states provide those requirements.

Tip 3: Aim for Completion

The medical record must tell the patient’s story. Impress upon your providers the importance of being as scrupulous as possible, especially when documenting details that could affect decision-making, such as allergies, past medical history, and pertinent medical conditions. In addition to helping with consistency, as mentioned in tip 1, using a checklist also helps you ensure that the medical record is complete.

Case in point: Audit findings often show that there is no documentation of medication allergies, adverse reactions, or NKA status, according to Bouzarelos. Using a checklist based on the NCQA core components would help to ensure allergy documentation.

Don’t forget: If the patient reports no allergies, you still need to make an allergy entry in the medical record indicating NKA. “Pertinent negatives are just as important as pertinent positives. Silence in the medical record should not necessarily be interpreted to mean negative or not applicable,” Moore maintains.