Urology Coding Alert

When coders make the same mistakes again and again, the feds could view those benign errors as a malignant attempt to cheat Medicare. With ICD-9 Coding transformed into a fraud-and-abuse risk area, providers must approach the subject with a carefully developed risk management program, said Pat Sevast, consultant with American Express Tax and Business Services in Timonium, Md., in a teleconference. To safeguard against common coding pitfalls, Sevast offers the following suggestions: 1. Have access to the rules. Coders must have access to and understand the federal, state and private-payer requirements, Sevast emphasized. The only way to defend yourself against payers looking askance at your decisions is to show that you followed their requirements. And you can do that only if you know what those requirements are. Be sure to get written documentation of these rules to support your decisions. 2. Always base coding on medical record documentation. Be fanatical about reviewing documentation to be sure the record supports the codes selected, Sevast warned. And when you're coding, make sure you have all the patient's documentation in front of you so you can make the proper choices. 3. Keep up-to-date coding reference material. The coding changes published in May take effect Oct. 1. After that date you should use coding books marked "ICD-9 Codes Book 2003." Order yours now if you haven't already, she said. 4. Run system reports to discover claims with invalid codes. Once new codes take effect, you need to find existing patients with codes that are no longer valid and correct the codes. 5. Never use abbreviated "cheat sheets." Your coding book will help you find the right code, and user-friendly books will make your job much easier, Sevast advised. Consulting the alphabetical index, the tabular index and the procedural codes will ensure you comply with coding requirements. Always use both the alphabetical as well as the tabular index when looking for a code. 6. Beware of assumption coding. When a coder sees that a patient is receiving a specific treatment or is on a certain medication, it's tempting to assume that "a patient with that medication must have this diagnosis," Sevast said. Then when you review the physician's diagnosis choices, you may want to add the one you just assumed and code it. Don't. First be sure you have a physician's confirmation and adequate documentation for the additional diagnosis, she warned. 7. Never alter documentation. Even if the change "sounds better," if you have a question about the documentation, ask the physician before changing anything, Sevast advised. If you need to make changes, document the discussion and follow your practice's protocols for correcting information. 8. Don't bill for services provided by unqualified or unlicensed personnel. [...]