Question: Our practice is trying to decide on whether to stick with our server-based EHR or move to a cloud vendor. Can you explain the difference between the two options? Indiana Subscriber Answer: Cloud service providers offer options for storing protected health information (PHI) and adapting EHRs to fit the scale and scope of any organization, which can be extremely beneficial to cash-strapped practices. In addition, cloud technologies come with a multitude of advantages and generally offer more technical latitude than client-server systems. For example, with a client-server system, space is needed for the physical hardware. Extra staff are often required to ensure the system runs smoothly, and the data is secure. However, with a cloud storage system, practices offload most of those responsibilities to a vendor, who provides software and file storage from elsewhere, beyond the practice’s walls. In the past, server-based systems were the norm. But, now due to their many advantages, cloud systems have become more popular, particularly for smaller organizations. For one, they are less expensive. Cloud-based EHRs are more versatile and can be accessed at any moment from any location. There is also a reduced risk of them being breached since there is no physical hardware to steal. And, vendors tend to upgrade systems overnight, so staff rarely wait for the go-ahead to resume work. If you are looking into an upgrade or feel dissatisfied with what you’re running now, check out these four advantages to moving to a cloud-based system: