Radiology Coding Alert

Reader Question:

Prove Necessity for Duplex + Physiologic Study

Question: When I report 93880, may I report 93875 and 93886, too, if the physician performs all three? And when I report 93970, may I also report 93965? Or are these services bundled? Pennsylvania Subscriber Answer: Although Correct Coding Initiative (CCI) edits don't bundle the code combinations you mention, that doesn't mean payers will consider performing the services together medically necessary. Case in point: Highmark, Pennsylvania's Medicare contractor, published local coverage determination (LCD) L27504, "Non-Invasive Cerebrovascular Arterial Studies." The LCD states that "it is usually unnecessary to perform more than one type of physiological study on the same anatomic area." If the radiologist must perform a second test because the first isn't interpretable, the LCD instructs you to report only the successful test. Also, Highmark will rarely reimburse 93875 (Noninvasive physiologic studies of extracranial arteries, complete bilateral study [e.g., periorbital flow direction with arterial compression, ocular pneumoplethysmography,  Doppler ultrasound spectral [...]
You’ve reached your limit of free articles. Already a subscriber? Log in.
Not a subscriber? Subscribe today to continue reading this article. Plus, you’ll get:
  • Simple explanations of current healthcare regulations and payer programs
  • Real-world reporting scenarios solved by our expert coders
  • Industry news, such as MAC and RAC activities, the OIG Work Plan, and CERT reports
  • Instant access to every article ever published in Revenue Cycle Insider
  • 6 annual AAPC-approved CEUs
  • The latest updates for CPT®, ICD-10-CM, HCPCS Level II, NCCI edits, modifiers, compliance, technology, practice management, and more

Other Articles in this issue of

Radiology Coding Alert

View All