Radiology Coding Alert

Reader Question:

Ask Private Payers for a -59 Alternative

Question: In your August article "Modifiers -51 and -59: Under the Microscope," you recommended that coders should report modifier -59 when attempting to unbundle National Correct Coding Initiative (NCCI) edits. One of our private payers uses the NCCI edits but does not recognize modifier -59, and this causes a lot of denials. What should we report instead? Massachusetts Subscriber Answer: Many private payers do not honor certain modifiers, and modifier -59 (Distinct procedural service) tops the list. Because your insurer recognizes the NCCI edits, you should ask the payer how you should submit claims that would normally warrant modifier -59. You may need to ask such payers to include language in their participation contracts that advises how to process such claims. This way, you can protect your reimbursement rights and ensure reimbursement when you perform two medically necessary services that other payers allow you to report using modifier -59. The insurer may ask you to submit the claims on separate claim forms or append a different modifier instead.  
You’ve reached your limit of free articles. Already a subscriber? Log in.
Not a subscriber? Subscribe today to continue reading this article. Plus, you’ll get:
  • Simple explanations of current healthcare regulations and payer programs
  • Real-world reporting scenarios solved by our expert coders
  • Industry news, such as MAC and RAC activities, the OIG Work Plan, and CERT reports
  • Instant access to every article ever published in Revenue Cycle Insider
  • 6 annual AAPC-approved CEUs
  • The latest updates for CPT®, ICD-10-CM, HCPCS Level II, NCCI edits, modifiers, compliance, technology, practice management, and more

Other Articles in this issue of

Radiology Coding Alert

View All

Which Codify by AAPC tool is right for you?

Call 844-334-2816 to speak with a Codify by AAPC specialist now.