Question: When we see that documentation doesn’t match a code choice, we usually go back to the pulmonologist with questions, and sometimes they’ll acquiesce, agreeing that a lower-level code should have been submitted on the claim. But other times the doctor will want to add additional documentation so the chart matches the code they want to bill. Is this okay? Codify Subscriber Answer: Yes, a physician can go back and add an addendum to the record to correct/add additional information. Of course, you must stay within the regulations of your payer, state laws, hospital rules, and your own compliance program to do this. In addition, you must ensure that the physician isn’t amending the record just to get the claim paid. Sign and date: One critical issue when amending a patient’s medical record is that the physician needs to ensure that any subsequent treating provider reviewing the patient’s medical record can determine precisely what the amendment is and when it was made. That means physicians should initial or sign an addendum and include the date and time they made the revision. The caregiver who performed the service should personally make the change to the record. The signature and date can’t be added by a representative or the coder. Avoid: You should never consider whether the patient has coverage when making your decision on how to treat the patient, and you can’t change the record to reflect information that will help get the claim paid if it’s not true to what the doctor performed. The language used when discussing code changes with a provider can be important. A coder might say, “You usually perform an X in this situation and code XXXXX, but I didn’t see it in the note. Could you review the note and see if it is complete?” rather than “If you add X to the note, we could bill XXXXX and get so much more reimbursement.” Follow these steps to make sure your corrections will pass a review: Tip: Always review your payers’ addendum rules, especially federal health programs like Medicare and Medicaid.