Pulmonology Coding Alert
You Be the Coder:
Check Necessity of Modifier to Separate Components of PFT
Published on Fri May 31, 2013
You’ve reached your limit of free articles. Already a subscriber? Log in.
Not a subscriber? Subscribe today to continue reading this article. Plus, you’ll get:
Other Articles in this issue of
Pulmonology Coding Alert
- CPT® 2013 Coding Strategies:
Zero In On The Right Bronchial Thermoplasty Code With This Advice
Hint: Check the necessity of prior authorization to avoid payer denials. Counting the number of [...] - Key Elements:
Crosscheck ROS Documentation to Capture Higher Level E/M Opportunities
Hint: Guide your clinician to complete documentation of review of systems. Ensuring your pulmonologist is [...] - ICD-10 Update:
Look For Easy Crossover to J82 For Pulmonary Eosinophilia
Hint: Pulmonary infiltrates NOS should be reported with a different code as in ICD-9. When [...] - You Be the Coder:
Check Necessity of Modifier to Separate Components of PFT
Question: Can you bill ‘94620’ along with a full PFT, codes ‘94060’, ‘94726’ and ‘94729’? [...] - Reader Question:
Append Modifiers When Time Requirements for Polysomnography Aren't Met
Question: If polysomnography test was started, but after 15 minutes has to be stopped, because [...] - Reader Question:
Factor Peak Flow Measurements as Part of E/M Service
Question: Can 94150 be billed for peak flow measurement alone without total vital capacity? One [...] - Reader Question:
Note That Immunization by MA Doesn't Usually Qualify for E/M
Question: This is the first year we are considering providing FluMist without a physician visit. [...]
View All
