Question: A new patient reported to our physician office complaining of wheezing and shortness of breath (SOB). The physician performed a level-three E/M, and then ordered a spirometry with graphic record (we own the equipment, and the test was performed and interpreted in-house). Encounter notes describe “likely” emphysema, though the spirometry did not confirm it. How should I handle the diagnosis coding here? Should I wait for a definitive diagnosis before coding this claim?
Michigan Subscriber
Answer: The encounter you describe resulted in an inconclusive diagnosis; however, that does not mean you cannot report -- and be paid for -- the physician’s services. Just make sure the documentation supports the claim, and submit it with ICD-10 codes to represent the patient’s presenting symptoms.
ICD-10-CM coding guidelines state, “Codes that describe symptoms and signs, as opposed to diagnoses, are acceptable for reporting purposes when a related definitive diagnosis has not been established (confirmed) by the provider.”
Translation: If the physician does not confirm emphysema at this time, do not consider reporting any emphysema diagnoses. If the patient comes back for further testing that does reveal emphysema, then you can report an emphysema diagnosis.
On the claim, report the following:
Support the visit with diagnosis codes:
Benefit: By coding signs and symptoms, you avoid labeling a patient with an unconfirmed diagnosis. Further, it allows you to code for your physician’s services even in those instances when she cannot establish a definitive diagnosis. In addition to “likely,” these are other words that can indicate that the physician has not formally diagnosed the patient with a condition, such as “probable,” “suspected,” “questionable,” “possible” and “still to be determined.”