Pulmonology Coding Alert

READER QUESTIONS:

Gastric Contents Might Change Everything

Question: What ICD-9 code should I use for "rule out pulmonary aspiration"? The surgeon did a bronchoscopy, and this is the diagnosis he is billing with. He notes, "This is a 70-year-old man who underwent esophagectomy one week earlier and developed a wound dehiscence, and during his emergency repair, anesthesia department observed gastric contents in the back of his throat." He then describes the procedures.


Michigan Subscriber


Answer: If the physician performed bronchoscopy and confirmed the presence of gastric contents in the airways, you can report 934.x (Foreign body in trachea, bronchus, and lung) on the claim. If the bronchoscopy confirmed that there were no gastric contents in the patient's airways, you can report the "regurgitation" of gastric contents (787.03, Vomiting alone) since this was the indication of the procedure.

You should never report conditions that the physician considers "probable," "possible," "suspected" or "rule out." You should report the signs and/or symptoms that a patient has, until a physician can confirm or rule out the suspected condition (via diagnostic testing or further evaluation). 
You’ve reached your limit of free articles. Already a subscriber? Log in.
Not a subscriber? Subscribe today to continue reading this article. Plus, you’ll get:
  • Simple explanations of current healthcare regulations and payer programs
  • Real-world reporting scenarios solved by our expert coders
  • Industry news, such as MAC and RAC activities, the OIG Work Plan, and CERT reports
  • Instant access to every article ever published in Revenue Cycle Insider
  • 6 annual AAPC-approved CEUs
  • The latest updates for CPT®, ICD-10-CM, HCPCS Level II, NCCI edits, modifiers, compliance, technology, practice management, and more

Other Articles in this issue of

Pulmonology Coding Alert

View All