Pulmonology Coding Alert

Reader Questions:

Don't Ever Rewrite History - Stick With the Elements

Question: The chart that physicians use to select the level of history includes identifiers. For example, to determine a problem-focused history, documentation should show a history of present illness (HPI), no review of systems (ROS), and no past, family and/or social history (PFSH).

What should we do if the levels of HPI, ROS and PFSH don't match identically to the chart? How should I determine the levels?

Louisiana Subscriber Answer: You should select the level of history according to the elements present in the physician's documentation (HPI, ROS, PFSH). 

The components must meet all of the requirements for a specific level for you to submit a claim for that specific level. If the patient lacks one of the elements, your choice depends on the element that is lacking from the chart.

For example, a detailed history requires a minimum of four HPI elements (or the status of three chronic conditions when using 1997 guidelines), at least two ROS, and a comment about one of the "histories" (past, family, or social). 

Solution: If the documentation provides a comment about only one ROS, the documentation does not support the requirements for a detailed history. Therefore, you should select an expanded problem-focused code since the ROS requirements for this level have been met (one to three HPI elements, one ROS, zero PFSH).  
You’ve reached your limit of free articles. Already a subscriber? Log in.
Not a subscriber? Subscribe today to continue reading this article. Plus, you’ll get:
  • Simple explanations of current healthcare regulations and payer programs
  • Real-world reporting scenarios solved by our expert coders
  • Industry news, such as MAC and RAC activities, the OIG Work Plan, and CERT reports
  • Instant access to every article ever published in Revenue Cycle Insider
  • 6 annual AAPC-approved CEUs
  • The latest updates for CPT®, ICD-10-CM, HCPCS Level II, NCCI edits, modifiers, compliance, technology, practice management, and more

Other Articles in this issue of

Pulmonology Coding Alert

View All