Pulmonology Coding Alert

Reader Questions:

Don't Ever Rewrite History - Stick With the Elements

Question: The chart that physicians use to select the level of history includes identifiers. For example, to determine a problem-focused history, documentation should show a history of present illness (HPI), no review of systems (ROS), and no past, family and/or social history (PFSH).

What should we do if the levels of HPI, ROS and PFSH don't match identically to the chart? How should I determine the levels?

Louisiana Subscriber

Answer: You should select the level of history according to the elements present in the physician's documentation (HPI, ROS, PFSH). 

The components must meet all of the requirements for a specific level for you to submit a claim for that specific level. If the patient lacks one of the elements, your choice depends on the element that is lacking from the chart.

For example, a detailed history requires a minimum of four HPI elements (or the status of three chronic conditions when using 1997 guidelines), at least two ROS, and a comment about one of the "histories" (past, family, or social). 

Solution: If the documentation provides a comment about only one ROS, the documentation does not support the requirements for a detailed history. Therefore, you should select an expanded problem-focused code since the ROS requirements for this level have been met (one to three HPI elements, one ROS, zero PFSH).  

Other Articles in this issue of

Pulmonology Coding Alert

View All