Pulmonology Coding Alert

News You Can Use:

Find Out if Your Modifier 25 Claims Make the Grade

Carriers may soon crack down -- are you prepared? Knowing when you should append modifier 25 can be hard enough -- and thanks to a new transmittal from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, your modifier 25 claims may be even more of a hassle. Now is the time to sit up and pay attention, making sure your physician's documentation supports modifier 25. Take Note of 3 Key Points Your documentation supporting the use of modifier 25 (Significant, separately identifiable evaluation and management service by the same physician on the same day of the procedure or other service) will be under heavy scrutiny soon, judging from Transmittal 954, issued May 19 by CMS.
 
Clarification #1: CMS has added the word "usual," so the guidelines for modifier 25 now read: "a significant, separately identifiable E/M service that is above and beyond the usual pre- and postoperative work for the service." The addition is just meant to emphasize that any extra E/M service must be "above and beyond" the typical pre-op or post-op work, says Quinten Buechner with ProActive Consultants in Cumberland, Wis.
 
Clarification #2: Transmittal 954 clarifies that you don't need a different diagnosis for the E/M service and procedure or surgery to be able to use modifier 25.
 
Clarification #3: You'll now also need to make sure that you have appropriate documentation that proves the medical necessity of the separate same-day E/M service your pulmonologist provided. You don't need to submit this documentation with the claim, but it must be available upon request. Stress 'Significance' in Documentation The guidelines for using modifier 25 haven't actually changed, says Stacie L. Buck, RHIA, CCS-P, LHRM, vice president of Southeast Radiology Management in Stuart, Fla. "CMS is issuing clarification in light of the findings in the OIG's report on modifier 25." The Office of Inspector General found a 35 percent error rate for modifier 25 -- and $538 million in improper payments -- in its sample of claims from 2003.
 
But it's safe to say your modifier claims will be under more scrutiny. "I strongly believe providers will see more and more claims with 25 subjected to pre-   and postpayment review because of the OIG findings," Buck says.
 
Be proactive: All procedures, from simple injections to common diagnostic tests, include an "inherent" E/M component, according to CMS guidelines. Therefore, any E/M service you report separately must go "above and beyond" the minimal E/M that normally accompanies such a procedure.
 
When you're considering whether you should append modifier 25 to an E/M service code when your pulmonologist performs an E/M service and another procedure or service, follow these three tips:
 
• Make sure your claim includes E/M services that are significant and separately identifiable. The E/M [...]
You’ve reached your limit of free articles. Already a subscriber? Log in.
Not a subscriber? Subscribe today to continue reading this article. Plus, you’ll get:
  • Simple explanations of current healthcare regulations and payer programs
  • Real-world reporting scenarios solved by our expert coders
  • Industry news, such as MAC and RAC activities, the OIG Work Plan, and CERT reports
  • Instant access to every article ever published in Revenue Cycle Insider
  • 6 annual AAPC-approved CEUs
  • The latest updates for CPT®, ICD-10-CM, HCPCS Level II, NCCI edits, modifiers, compliance, technology, practice management, and more

Other Articles in this issue of

Pulmonology Coding Alert

View All