Pulmonology practices could suffer when billing this insurer.
If your pulmonology practice is like most others, you typically use modifier 25 multiple times a day - but the odds of collecting full pay for this frequently-reported modifier could be dropping dramatically. That's the word from Pennsylvania's Independence Blue Cross Blue Shield, which is making drastic reimbursement changes to the modifier.
Here's why: Effective Aug. 1, Independence will reimburse claims appended with modifier 25 (Significant, separately identifiable evaluation and management service by the same physician or other qualified health care professional on the same day of the procedure or other service) "at 50 percent of the applicable fee schedule amount" in the following circumstances, the payer said in a May 1 notification:
In addition, Independence's notification indicates that when you're using modifier 25, "documentation for the additional E/M must be entered in a separate section of the medical record in order to validate the separate and distinct nature of the E/M service." Therefore, it appears that this payer will no longer allow you to document both the E/M and the procedure in the same sentence or paragraph of the note.
Pay Cuts Could Be Major
Seeing your pay fall by 50 percent for E/M services with modifier 25 appended could be a drastic change for pulmonology practices. For example, when you report 99205 (Office or other outpatient visitfor the evaluation and management of a new patient...), you normally collect about $210, based on the 2017 Medicare Physician Fee Schedule values. However, under the new Independence Blue Cross rules, that number will fall to just $105. Say you report 99205-25 twice a day at your GI practice - you've now lost $1,050 a week, or almost $55,000 annually, from Independence Blue Cross Blue Shield.
"This policy is absurd," says Barbara J. Cobuzzi, MBA, CPC, CENTC, COC, CPC-P, CPC-I, CPCO, AAPC Fellow and vice president at Stark Coding & Consulting LLC, in Shrewsbury, New Jersey. Although the policy is not a broad CMS directive, it could begin to infiltrate other payers if practices affected by it don't act quickly.
"This will be problematic especially since they are including initial services in the list of applicable E/Ms," says Carol Pohlig BSN, RN, CPC, ACS, senior coding and education specialist at the Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania.
"Now, if you decide to intervene with the patient at the conclusion of the initial evaluation, you will be penalized and not rewarded for all of your hard work and time."
Check This Example for Clarity
Consider the following example to illustrate how the Independence policy will impact practices.
Example: The pulmonologist performs an E/M service and a thoracentesis on the same date. In this situation, the pulmonologist would have to accept the 50 percent payment reduction from the E/M on that date. While outpatient procedures can likely be postponed to another day, the medical need for acutely ill patient increases the likelihood of an evaluation resulting in a same day thoracentesis,
Consider this advice: "Anyone with Independent BCBS contracts should fight this," says Glenn D. Littenberg, MD, MACP, FASGE, a Pasadena, California physician. "The state medical society should be approached to see if this policy represents such a radical reinterpretation of contract terms that is not a legally allowable unilateral amendment without the payer getting permission from the state's department of insurance or other regulatory body. Some states have such regulations. If we fail to fight against arbitrary payment cuts, the practice is likely to spread to other Blues and other private payers."
Resource: To read the complete announcement from Independence Blue Cross Blue Shield, visit http://medpolicy.ibx.com/policies/MPI.nsf/37cd15d9dd9527e785257bad00554274/85256AA800623D7A852580B50070FC2D!OpenDocument.
