Pulmonology Coding Alert

Modifier:

Modifier 62 Eases Your Multi-Provider Coding Dilemma

Your CPT should jive on both surgeons' op notes, or else bid $4k goodbye.When you come face-to-face with multi-provider situation, the last thing you would want is to mess up your coding by assigning the wrong modifier(s). Modifiers can be a friend or a foe, depending on how you use them -- or when you use them.Scenario: A 70-year-old female patient who presents with COPD and coronary artery disease, status post myocardial infarction (CAD s/p MI) has a 28 mm of inner diameter thoracic aortic aneurysm. Imaging studies indicate the aneurysm to be descending. The cardiologist, together with a thoracic surgeon, decides to perform an open operative repair with graft replacement of the diseased segment.The main key in a multi-provider scenario is to treat each physician's work as a separate activity. However, deciding when to report a case as co-surgery, assistant surgery -- or something else -- has more to it than meets [...]
You’ve reached your limit of free articles. Already a subscriber? Log in.
Not a subscriber? Subscribe today to continue reading this article. Plus, you’ll get:
  • Simple explanations of current healthcare regulations and payer programs
  • Real-world reporting scenarios solved by our expert coders
  • Industry news, such as MAC and RAC activities, the OIG Work Plan, and CERT reports
  • Instant access to every article ever published in Revenue Cycle Insider
  • 6 annual AAPC-approved CEUs
  • The latest updates for CPT®, ICD-10-CM, HCPCS Level II, NCCI edits, modifiers, compliance, technology, practice management, and more

Other Articles in this issue of

Pulmonology Coding Alert

View All

Which Codify by AAPC tool is right for you?

Call 844-334-2816 to speak with a Codify by AAPC specialist now.