Pulmonology Coding Alert

Don't Miss Out:

Learn When You Can Report Both a Procedure and a Separate E/M

Don't forget to append modifier 25 when you report multiple services When your pulmonologist performs a procedure such as a bronchoscopy, you should closely review the documentation for indications of a separately identifiable E/M service or you may be missing out on an opportunity to report both the procedure code and a separate E/M service. The following two scenarios will help you determine whether the service your physician provided constitutes an additional E/M. Documentation Must Support Separate Billing If you have a hard time determining what constitutes a separate E/M service when your pulmonologist performs a procedure, remember that your physician needs to document a significant, separately identifiable service.

For every procedure your physician performs, he must complete a cursory history and physical (H&P) on the day of the procedure, says Carol Pohlig, BSN, RN, CPC, senior coding and education specialist at the University of Pennsylvania Department of Medicine in Philadelphia. So, to report a separate E/M service, your pulmonologist must document a service that is above and beyond the pre- and post-operative care associated with the procedure.

You can't report a separate E/M for information that your pulmonologist gathers for the H&P required by the hospital. An evaluation of the underlying medical condition or disease, however, goes beyond the normal care associated with the procedure, so you can report a separate E/M code. Consultations Are Separately Identifiable Scenario 1: An internist admits a patient to the hospital due to increasing shortness of breath (786.05) and requests that a pulmonologist perform a consultation. The pulmonologist reviews the patient's x-rays and medical records, and then determines that a bronchoscopy is warranted. He then preps the patient and performs the bronchoscopy in the hospital that same day.

Coding solution: The pulmonologist performed a consultation, during which he made the decision for bronchoscopy, and then he performed the procedure. In this scenario, you should report both services. Submit 99251-99255 (Initial inpatient consultation for a new or established patient...) based on the level of service the physician provided, Pohlig says. Then, report 31622 (Bronchoscopy, rigid or flexible, with or without fluoroscopic guidance; diagnostic, with or without cell washing [separate procedure]).

Note: Remember to append modifier 25 (Significant, separately identifiable evaluation and management service by the same physician on the same day of the procedure or other service) to the E/M code to indicate that the service is separately identifiable from the procedure.

Caution: Make sure that your physician meets and documents the requirements of a consultation before you report the appropriate code. See the accompanying article "Identify What Makes a Consultation" for more on coding consultations. Post-operative Care May Warrant a Separate Code Scenario 2: Your pulmonologist sees a patient in the office and based on his [...]
You’ve reached your limit of free articles. Already a subscriber? Log in.
Not a subscriber? Subscribe today to continue reading this article. Plus, you’ll get:
  • Simple explanations of current healthcare regulations and payer programs
  • Real-world reporting scenarios solved by our expert coders
  • Industry news, such as MAC and RAC activities, the OIG Work Plan, and CERT reports
  • Instant access to every article ever published in Revenue Cycle Insider
  • 6 annual AAPC-approved CEUs
  • The latest updates for CPT®, ICD-10-CM, HCPCS Level II, NCCI edits, modifiers, compliance, technology, practice management, and more

Other Articles in this issue of

Pulmonology Coding Alert

View All

Which Codify by AAPC tool is right for you?

Call 844-334-2816 to speak with a Codify by AAPC specialist now.