Pulmonology Coding Alert

Coding Scenario:

Equip Yourself with Solid Spirometry Coding Options

Find out why E/M + modifier 25 is not a solid equation. When you're coding for spirometry testing, it's important you know the difference between the more common coding options. You should always ask the one critical question that can turn your selection process into a success: "Which of the spirometry codes do I need to include in my claim, and which of them should I discard?" The scenario: An established patient presents to the office for a follow-up visit after experiencing mild dyspnea where she was given a nebulizer or inhaler treatment. The pulmonologist also evaluates the patient's respiratory status at that visit to determine the cause for dyspnea. Don't Leave Out the Possibility of Reporting 94664 Sometimes patients who regularly use inhalers need to learn how to use the device correctly. If the staff ran a demo on how to use it properly, you have the option to [...]
You’ve reached your limit of free articles. Already a subscriber? Log in.
Not a subscriber? Subscribe today to continue reading this article. Plus, you’ll get:
  • Simple explanations of current healthcare regulations and payer programs
  • Real-world reporting scenarios solved by our expert coders
  • Industry news, such as MAC and RAC activities, the OIG Work Plan, and CERT reports
  • Instant access to every article ever published in Revenue Cycle Insider
  • 6 annual AAPC-approved CEUs
  • The latest updates for CPT®, ICD-10-CM, HCPCS Level II, NCCI edits, modifiers, compliance, technology, practice management, and more

Other Articles in this issue of

Pulmonology Coding Alert

View All