Pulmonology Coding Alert

Case Study, Part II:

Consider More Than Just Time For Critical Care Coding

When your pulmonologist records critical care time with multiple procedures, don't stop at critical care codes, because your billing may require more specificity.

Here's the second segment of a three-part series that focuses on a patient who undergoes multiple bronchoscopies. Please refer to the July 2005 Pulmonology Coding Alert for " Case Study, Part I: Avoid Common Coding Snafus for Multiple Bronchoscopies." Take a Look at the Operative Report After the initial bronchoscopies and trying to remove the mucus plugs, the pulmonologist continued to have the same problem. At this point, the pulmonologist noted three hours of critical care time. The endotracheal tube still seemed to be kinked against the tracheal wall.

The pulmonologist then examined the patient's vocal chords with a straight laryngoscope. At that time, the pulmonologist discovered that the cuff was sitting between the patient's vocal chords and that the endotracheal tube was kinked upward into the vocal chords. The pulmonologist then straightened the tube and advanced it downward again.

The pulmonologist performed a bronchoscopy, and he passed the endotracheal tube into the right, main bronchus. After that, the pulmonologist completed multiple bronchoscopies because he was able to proceed downward to the lower end of the endotracheal tube without any resistance, and the lower end of the patient's trachea was open without any resistance.

At this time, the pulmonologist reattempted to use the bronchoscope to suction out mucus plugs from the patient's left bronchus. He had some success but notes that the patient's left main bronchus still had significant long, stringy, thick mucus plugs. After multiple attempts to suction these plugs, the pulmonologist ended the procedure.

After the pulmonologist adjusted the endotracheal tube and performed another bronchoscopy on the patient, the patient's pulse oximetry rose to 92 percent. The pulmonologist expects the pulse oximetry to continue to rise.

The patient will continue to receive physical therapy and Mucomyst. The pulmonologist will have to attempt another bronchoscopy on this patient at a later time. Critical Care May Not Be What You Expect As mentioned in Part I of this case study, because the pulmonologist performs a second bronchoscopy to remove the mucus plugging, you should report a therapeutic bronchoscopy, says Carol Pohlig, BSN, RN, CPC, senior coding and education specialist at the University of Pennsylvania department of medicine in Philadelphia. Given the above documentation, you should report 31646 (Bronchoscopy [rigid or flexible]; with therapeutic aspiration of tracheobronchial tree, subsequent).

Don't miss: The pulmonologist performed the second bronchoscopy (31646) on the same day.

NCCI considers 31645 (... with therapeutic aspiration of tracheobronchial tree, initial) and 31646 as mutually exclusive codes. This means that a pulmonologist would perform these two services on the same day. NCCI assigns modifier "1" to this code pair, [...]
You’ve reached your limit of free articles. Already a subscriber? Log in.
Not a subscriber? Subscribe today to continue reading this article. Plus, you’ll get:
  • Simple explanations of current healthcare regulations and payer programs
  • Real-world reporting scenarios solved by our expert coders
  • Industry news, such as MAC and RAC activities, the OIG Work Plan, and CERT reports
  • Instant access to every article ever published in your eNewsletter
  • 6 annual AAPC-approved CEUs*
  • The latest updates for CPT®, ICD-10-CM, HCPCS Level II, NCCI edits, modifiers, compliance, technology, practice management, and more
*CEUs available with select eNewsletters.

Other Articles in this issue of

Pulmonology Coding Alert

View All