Careful: 94375 is hot on bundles. Combat these three common mistakes in reporting extrinsic allergic alveolitis, and your claim will soar to success. Say a patient presents with fever, muscular aches, dry cough, shortness of breath, and a general feeling of being unwell. Although these symptoms could lead your pulmonologist to report extrinsic allergic alveolitis (495.x), it may not be the appropriate ICD-9 code. Digging deeper than the tip of the iceberg means your physician should take several steps to properly diagnose this condition, but the whole process could leave you dazed and confused. Mistake #1: You Overlook E/M Encounter Extrinsic allergic alveolitis (495.x) is a lung disorder resulting from repeated inhalation of organic dust, usually in a specific occupational setting, otherwise known as hypersensitivity pneumonitis. In diagnosis, the best evidence for this condition is the patient's occupation and a history of exposure to animal or vegetable dusts. The doctor may want to do some tests to verify the diagnosis, including spirometry (94010), flow volume loop (94375), lung volume (94240), diffusing capacity (94720), and pulse oximetry (94760), antigen challenge test (94070, 95071) and blood test (86001, 85025). With these many codes involved, how would you know which one should make it to your report? Hold that thought: Caveat: Mistake #2: You Charge All Tests For The Provider Besides the E/M code, you may report some of the tests that the pulmonologist may have ordered, including: 94070 (Bronchospasm provocation evaluation, multiple spirometric determinations as in 94010, with administered agents [e.g., antigen[s], cold air, methacholine]) for postexposure evaluation; 95071 (Inhalation bronchial challenge testing [not including necessary pulmonary function tests]; with antigens or gases, specify) for antigen challenge testing; 94240 (Functional residual capacity or residual volume: helium method, nitrogen open circuit method, or other method) for lung volume; and 94720 (Carbon monoxide diffusing capacity [e.g., single breath, steady state]) for diffusing capacity. Watch out: In the same vein, don't bill prolonged postexposure evaluation (94070) and antigen challenge test (95071) for your pulmonologist unless these pulmonary function tests (PFTs) are performed in the physician's privately owned PFT lab. If the PFTs took place in a hospital-based PFT laboratory, then you would report only the professional components of the service by appending modifier 26 (e.g., 94070-26). The facility-based lab reports the technical components (94070-TC, 95071), says Alan L. Plummer, MD, professor of medicine, Division of Pulmonary, Allergy, and Critical Care at Emory University School of Medicine in Atlanta. Mistake #3: CCI Bundles Get Past Your Radar If the pulmonologist orders both spirometry (94010) and flow volume loop (94375, Respiratory flow volume loop) as diagnostic tests, you would have to leave 94375 off your claim. Why: Also, 94375 is a component of the antigen challenge test 94070. While you should not report them together on the same day, the Correct Coding Initiative (CCI) edits allows a modifier to differentiate between the services provided for separate reasons during separate sessions on the same day. Another code that bundles into 94070 is 94010 (spirometry). The only time you would report these codes separately is when the pulmonologist orders spirometry for a separate and distinct reason. For instance, the physician orders 94010 as the first test, but the results indicate a problem that requires additional testing. The physician then orders prolonged postexposure evaluation (94070) as a second test. In such cases, you would report attach modifier 59 (Distinct procedural service) to 94010 to show that this CPT is distinct from 94070.