Question: A 12-year-old presents with bronchitis with a history of asthma. Should I report the diagnosis as: Answer: Neither option "a" nor "b" is a good choice. Although you should list 466.0 (Acute bronchitis) as the primary - and possibly only - diagnosis, you should probably avoid using an unspecified asthma code (493.9x, 493.x0). When you don't have access to the FP's notes, go back to the physician for more information, if the documentation supports assigning an asthma code at all.
a) 466.0, 493.92 or b) 493.90?
Wisconsin Subscriber
If the FP simply mentions that the patient has a history of asthma, you may want to reconsider reporting 493.xx. Part of the decision depends on the service's place of service:
Be careful: Most insurers will deny unspecified asthma code 493.9x. You may have to submit additional notes and ultimately have to select a specific code.
Better method: Before filing the claim, get the information you need to avoid using an unspecified code. You don't indicate that the patient's asthma is exacerbated (493.x2, ... with [acute] exacerbation) or that the condition requires treatment with a nebulizer, so the patient's asthma is probably stable. In this case, you would use a fifth-digit subclassification of 1 (... with status asthmaticus).
You can assign the appropriate specific asthma code with one more piece of information: the patient's asthma type. Use 493.01 for a stable extrinsic (typical) asthmatic and 493.11 for a stable intrinsic (less common) asthmatic.