Primary Care Coding Alert

Reader question:

Steer Clear of 'Seen and Agreed' Note or Face Denials

Question: Our physician works with residents each year. It's very time consuming, but he does review their documentation and indicates whether he agrees with their findings. He doesn't use a rubber stamp -- he actually writes, "Seen and agreed" on the chart before he signs it. A consultant told us during an audit that documenting this way is unacceptable. Can you explain the problem?California SubscriberAnswer: The consultant is correct. Although you're correct in knowing that a "seen and agreed" rubber stamp is unacceptable, CMS says a handwritten note of the same phrase is also a no-go.Explanation: "Seen and agree," followed by a legible countersignature or identity is an example of unacceptable documentation, according to CMS' Medicare Claims Processing Manual, Publication 100-04, Chapter 12, Section 100.1.1, which you may find online at http://www.cms.gov/manuals/downloads/clm104c12.pdf. Other examples of similar documentation CMS also considers unacceptable include, "Rounded, reviewed, agree" and "Discussed with resident. Agree."Better [...]
You’ve reached your limit of free articles. Already a subscriber? Log in.
Not a subscriber? Subscribe today to continue reading this article. Plus, you’ll get:
  • Simple explanations of current healthcare regulations and payer programs
  • Real-world reporting scenarios solved by our expert coders
  • Industry news, such as MAC and RAC activities, the OIG Work Plan, and CERT reports
  • Instant access to every article ever published in Revenue Cycle Insider
  • 6 annual AAPC-approved CEUs
  • The latest updates for CPT®, ICD-10-CM, HCPCS Level II, NCCI edits, modifiers, compliance, technology, practice management, and more

Other Articles in this issue of

Primary Care Coding Alert

View All

Which Codify by AAPC tool is right for you?

Call 844-334-2816 to speak with a Codify by AAPC specialist now.