Primary Care Coding Alert

Reader Question:

Modifier -90 Isn't Your Lab-Test Code Ticket

Question: When we send specimens to the lab, we code the test with modifier -90 and add a small percentage to the charge amount to cover our clinic expenses. One of our family physicians thinks this is illegal and wants to change the way we do business. Is he correct - are we coding incorrectly?

Colorado Subscriber Answer: You and your doctor may both be correct. From a coding standpoint, you are right that modifier -90 (Reference [outside] laboratory) represents a test that an outside laboratory, not an office, performs.

Your physician, however, correctly points out that you may be reporting these services improperly. If the lab submits the same test code that you do, you are double- billing the service.

To avoid duplicate coding, you should have a written pass-through-billing agreement with the laboratory. If both parties agree to the arrangement, you would code for the laboratory's tests using modifier -90. The modifier indicates you are reporting a test that an outside laboratory performed.

Strategy: You should find out what your contract with the lab states. If you're not sure whether your agreement holds muster, check with your Medicare carrier. Because most insurance companies tend to follow Medicare's lead, your local carrier representative can usually inform you of acceptable coding practices.
You’ve reached your limit of free articles. Already a subscriber? Log in.
Not a subscriber? Subscribe today to continue reading this article. Plus, you’ll get:
  • Simple explanations of current healthcare regulations and payer programs
  • Real-world reporting scenarios solved by our expert coders
  • Industry news, such as MAC and RAC activities, the OIG Work Plan, and CERT reports
  • Instant access to every article ever published in Revenue Cycle Insider
  • 6 annual AAPC-approved CEUs
  • The latest updates for CPT®, ICD-10-CM, HCPCS Level II, NCCI edits, modifiers, compliance, technology, practice management, and more

Other Articles in this issue of

Primary Care Coding Alert

View All