Primary Care Coding Alert
Complete ROS Requires Double-Digit Reviews
Question: What is the difference between problem-pertinent, extended and complete review of systems (ROS) on an E/M service? Kentucky Subscriber Problem-pertinent: The physician performs a problem-pertinent ROS when he reviews a single system for the patient during the encounter. A problem-pertinent ROS can support up to an expanded problem-focused level of history, which can support up to a level-three established patient E/M service (99213) or level-two new patient E/M service (99202) -- but be sure to choose your E/M code based on your FP's entire set of encounter notes, not just the ROS level. Extended: When the physician conducts an extended ROS, there must be evidence that he checked the system directly related to the patient's problem and a -limited- number of additional systems. According to Medicare, -limited- can be anywhere from two to nine systems, depending on the service your physician provides. An extended ROS can support up to a detailed level of history, which can support a level-four established patient E/M service (99214) or level-three new patient E/M service (99203). Complete: The physician must review 10 or more systems to qualify for a complete ROS and must individually document those systems with positive or pertinent negative responses. For the remaining systems, a notation that all other systems are negative is permissible. In the absence of such a notation, the physician must individually document at least 10 systems. A complete ROS can support a comprehensive level of history, which can support a level-five established patient E/M service (99215) or a level-four or -five new patient E/M service (99204 or 99205). Answers to You Be the Coder and Reader Questions reviewed by Kent J. Moore, manager of Health Care Financing and Delivery Systems for the American Academy of Family Physicians in Leawood, Kan.
Answer: You-ll need to know the difference between the three ROS levels because ROS is a vital component to determining your level of history, which, in turn, determines the level of E/M service.
Primary Care Coding Alert
- Make Chronic Condition Coding Easier With These Tips
Remember: If the condition has no bearing on treatment, leave it off your claim Just [...] - Track the Most Common Chronic Conditions
Remember, physician presence not always needed for checkup Records show that 87 percent of Medicare [...] - Follow-Up Visits Might Mark Fracture Treatment
Ethically add $$ to claim by reporting fracture care codes instead of E/M Wondering when [...] - Reader Question:
Figure Diagnostic Decision Into E/M Code Choice
Question: An established patient reports with a severe headache and blurred vision. During the course [...] - Reader Question:
Check Balanced Budget Act for Supervision Rules
Question: If a nurse practitioner (NP) or physician assistant (PA) performs a diagnostic test, as [...] - Reader Question:
Wheezing ICD-9 Code Doesn't Represent 'WARI'
Question: Concerning the coding of acute bronchospasm (519.11), when is it appropriate to simply code [...] - Reader Question:
Medication Might Not Indicate Diagnosis
Question: Can we code a condition or disease if the FP notes in the documentation [...] - Reader Question:
Avoid Paybacks for Cloned Documentation
Question: I often use previous electronic medical record (EMR) charts with the same chief complaint [...] - Reader Question:
Complete ROS Requires Double-Digit Reviews
Question: What is the difference between problem-pertinent, extended and complete review of systems (ROS) on [...] - You Be The Coder:
ICD-9 Coding When Doctor Doesn't Diagnose Depression
Question: When a patient exhibits signs of depression, but the FP does not diagnose depression, [...]
