Primary Care Coding Alert
Bill 92504 Alone, Not With 69210
Question: The physician cleared cerumen impaction from the patient’s left ear and purulent drainage from the right. He used the operating microscope to clear with suction bilaterally. We’re thinking our best coding strategy might be 69210-LT with 92504-59-RT. What’s your recommendation?
Answer: The claim should contain only one procedure code — either the impacted cerumen removal (69210, Removal impacted cerumen [separate procedure], 1 or both ears) or the microscopy (92504, Binocular microscopy [separate diagnostic procedure]).
Reasoning: These codes are listed as “separate procedures” in the CPT® book. According to the CPT® separate procedure notes, procedures with descriptors containing this term “are commonly carried out as an integral component of a total service or procedure.” These codes “should not be reported in addition to the code for the total procedure or service of which it is considered an integral component,” according to surgery guidelines.
Result: When a physician performs a separate procedure and another procedure in the same area, CPT® includes the separate procedure in the other procedure. So, if the physician does anything in the ear with microscopy, CPT® includes 92504 in the other ear procedure and the microscopy is not billable. Similarly, if the physician performs any ear procedure and also removes impacted cerumen, 69210 is included in the other ear procedure and is not billable.
CCI notes: Consistent with CPT®, current CCI (Correct Coding Initiative) edits list 92504 as a column 2 code for 69210, and the modifier indicator is “0,” which means you cannot bill the codes together in any circumstances.
Bottom line: Bill only 69210 for the encounter. No modifiers are necessary.
Illinois Subscriber
Primary Care Coding Alert
- CCI 19.1:
Newest Coding Edits Reverse Bundling for Some Injection Administrations
Start reporting vaccine administration with office consultation. The latest update from the Correct Coding Initiative [...] - Office Visits:
Don't Miss These 3 Chances to Bill Services With Preventive Care
Tip: Check whether the payer also requires modifier 25. Preventive wellness visits are easy to [...] - Billing:
Follow These 3 Steps to Cleaner Incident-To Claims
Don’t forget to check your state’s laws for NPP scope of services. Having non-physician practitioners [...] - ICD-10:
Get Extra Details to Avoid 'Unspecified' Viral Infection Diagnosis
Code 079.99 makes an easy switch, but payers might not reimburse. When your physician currently [...] - You Be the Coder:
Diagnosing Initial Vs. Follow-Up Fracture Visit
Question: Our physician treated a patient for a fracture of the second metatarsal. A follow-up [...] - Reader Question:
Bill 92504 Alone, Not With 69210
Question: The physician cleared cerumen impaction from the patient’s left ear and purulent drainage from [...] - Reader Question:
Replace Deleted Code G0366 With G0402 or G0403
Question: A 65-year-old patient who just enrolled in Medicare came to our office for his [...] - Reader Question:
Q2038, G0008 Is Acceptable Fluzone Pairing for Medicare Patients
Question: Medicare denies our claims for flu vaccines with claim status codes of 254 and 255, [...] - Reader Question:
Submit 692.6 for Poison Ivy Diagnosis
Question: I’m having trouble finding a diagnosis code for 96372 when the physician administered two [...] - Reader Question:
Code 90714 Applies to All TD Vaccines in U.S.
Question: I know that, as of the first of the year, code 90718 has been [...]
