Primary Care Coding Alert

New or Established? Answer Wrong and It Could Cost You

Remember, what used to be a consultation is now likely a 99201-99215 service. Dr. FP provides a new patient with a standard office-visit E/M. You use an established patient E/M to code the encounter. No big deal, right? Wrong: Not only is the coding incorrect, but this mistake will cost your practice deserved reimbursement. Further, Medicare's deletion of consultation codes means that coders will have to answer the new vs. established question more often than before. For Medicare payers, and payers that follow their lead, coders will now have to "select the correct code, new or established, to bill for what used to be consults and did not have a new versus established component concept," relays Quinten A. Buechner, M.S., M.Div., AAPC:CPC, BMSC:ACS-FP/GI/PEDS, ACMCS:PCS, PHIA:CCP, PAHCS:CMSCS, president of ProActive Consultants,LLC in Cumberland, Wis. Don't get Dr. FP steamed; nail the patient's status every time by following this expert advice on [...]
You’ve reached your limit of free articles. Already a subscriber? Log in.
Not a subscriber? Subscribe today to continue reading this article. Plus, you’ll get:
  • Simple explanations of current healthcare regulations and payer programs
  • Real-world reporting scenarios solved by our expert coders
  • Industry news, such as MAC and RAC activities, the OIG Work Plan, and CERT reports
  • Instant access to every article ever published in Revenue Cycle Insider
  • 6 annual AAPC-approved CEUs
  • The latest updates for CPT®, ICD-10-CM, HCPCS Level II, NCCI edits, modifiers, compliance, technology, practice management, and more