Primary Care Coding Alert

ICD-10:

Clarify Urosepsis Diagnosis Before Coding Under ICD-10

You won't find "urosepsis" terminology after October 2014.

If your physician notes the term "urosepsis" in a patient's chart, you may find yourself grappling with the question -- are you coding for a urinary tract infection (UTI) or a UTI with sepsis?

under ICD-9, that question doesn't hold as much bearing as in the future. Currently, you report 599.0 (Urinary tract infection, site not specified) for "urosepsis." According to ICD-9 guidelines, "The term urosepsis is a nonspecific term. If that is the only term documented then only code 599.0 should be assigned based on the default for the term in the ICD-9-CM index, in addition to the code for the causal organism if known."

Looking ahead: However, ICD-10 eliminates the term "urosepsis." The ICD-10 Manual includes a note to "code to condition," which means you must query the physician to determine the appropriate code assignment.

Specifically, ICD-10 guidelines state: (ii) Urosepsis. The term urosepsis is a nonspecific term. It is not to be considered synonymous with sepsis. It has no default code in the Alphabetic Index. Should a provider use this term, he/she must be queried for clarification.

Action item: Explain to your physicians and coders that "urosepsis" does not exist in ICD-10. That means your physician should not use that term, unless he wants to be bothered with queries. More specific documentation about this condition is necessary.

Other Articles in this issue of

Primary Care Coding Alert

View All