Primary Care Coding Alert

E/M Coding:

Stop Downcoding E/M Visits, and Add $56 to Your Bottom Line With These Tips

Trap: You might not only be losing revenue -- you're also coding improperly.National insurer data shows that physicians undercode E/M claims to the tune of more than $1 billion annually. That's money physicians could have collected based on their documentation but missed out on because they reported a lower-level E/M code than they should have. Read on for three reasons to always file claims based on the physician's documentation instead of "playing it safe" with lower-end codes.1. Staying Low Doesn't Keep You Below RadarIf you shy away from upper level E/M codes because you don't want to trigger an audit, remember this: Reporting all low-level codes will also get a payer's attention, because reviewers will wonder why your physician never offers high-level examinations. When claims reviewers review "bell curves" to determine whether a practice is coding outside the norm, they aren't just looking for upcoding -- they are looking at trends across [...]
You’ve reached your limit of free articles. Already a subscriber? Log in.
Not a subscriber? Subscribe today to continue reading this article. Plus, you’ll get:
  • Simple explanations of current healthcare regulations and payer programs
  • Real-world reporting scenarios solved by our expert coders
  • Industry news, such as MAC and RAC activities, the OIG Work Plan, and CERT reports
  • Instant access to every article ever published in Revenue Cycle Insider
  • 6 annual AAPC-approved CEUs
  • The latest updates for CPT®, ICD-10-CM, HCPCS Level II, NCCI edits, modifiers, compliance, technology, practice management, and more

Other Articles in this issue of

Primary Care Coding Alert

View All