Primary Care Coding Alert

6 Things to Consider When Reviewing Billed Service Levels

Teach physicians to create iron-clad MDM notes You can't get inside your FP's head to know whether his MDM warrants the E/M service code that he reported -- but zooming in on key areas can help you decide whether a 99214 needed downcoding or a 99213 needed upcoding.
 
Medical necessity is the number-one thing missing from charts, says P. Lynn Sallings, CPC, compliance officer for Family Medical Center, Area Health Education Center-Northwest in Fayetteville, Ark. Whether a claim's medical decision-making (MDM) supports the level of service the physician reported is the first thing Arkansas Medicare and Medicaid auditors look for, she says.
 
But you can be your FP's front line of defense and make sure his notes withstand scrutiny, if you follow these tips. 1. Identify a Mismatch With This Strategy In your next staff education meeting, remind your FPs that medical necessity should be the overarching factor they use to select the E/M service level (such as 99201-99215, Office visit or other outpatient visit for the evaluation and management of a new or established patient -). -Just because a physician does a comprehensive history and examination doesn't mean he should report 99215,- Sallings says. Medical necessity should drive the components that he performs, she says.
 
You can help ensure your physicians are selecting appropriate codes by occasionally pulling a sample of their charts. -Look at the patient's chief complaint and the encounter's outcome -- or it's final diagnosis,- Sallings says. If the primary ICD-9 code does not support a billed upper level of service, you should really read the chart notes, she says.
 
Example: A patient presents with a chief complaint (CC) of sinusitis, which is also the ICD-9 code that the FP reported -- 461.1 (Acute sinusitis; frontal). Although the physician could have performed and documented the elements necessary for a detailed history and detailed examination, -the CC of sinusitis probably wouldn't warrant 99214,- Sallings says. 2. Look for Potential MDM-Boosting Factors But complicating factors could make 99214 and 461.x a match. The patient may have comorbidities or other chronic conditions, says Lori-Lynne Webb, director of coding and compliance with Saltzer Medical Group in Nampa, Idaho. And medications that the patient is already taking or adverse reactions the patient had to previous medications could increase the level of MDM.
 
Good idea: Ask your FPs to list complicating factors. Unless the chart spells these out, you have no way of knowing that a comorbidity, chronic condition or medication played a role in upping an office visit's MDM from low (99213) to moderate (99214) complexity. 3. Unveil Extra Complexity in These Places Medication can lead to a higher-level MDM another way. Look at the tests and medications the FP ordered for clues to the [...]
You’ve reached your limit of free articles. Already a subscriber? Log in.
Not a subscriber? Subscribe today to continue reading this article. Plus, you’ll get:
  • Simple explanations of current healthcare regulations and payer programs
  • Real-world reporting scenarios solved by our expert coders
  • Industry news, such as MAC and RAC activities, the OIG Work Plan, and CERT reports
  • Instant access to every article ever published in your eNewsletter
  • 6 annual AAPC-approved CEUs*
  • The latest updates for CPT®, ICD-10-CM, HCPCS Level II, NCCI edits, modifiers, compliance, technology, practice management, and more
*CEUs available with select eNewsletters.