Primary Care Coding Alert

3 Cases Cut to the Chase on Nosebleed Treatment Coding

Here's how to ID nosebleed repairs that only amount to E/Ms. When a patient reports to the FP for anterior nosebleed treatment, the coder chooses an E/M code, a procedure code ... or both. The code, or codes, you choose for each nosebleed repair depends on encounter  specifics. Check out these nosebleed fix case studies, which explain the three most likely coding scenarios FP practices will see. Case 1: E/M Code Only If a patient reports to the physician with a nosebleed and the physician stops the bleeding with standard methods, you should choose an E/M code for the entire encounter, confirms Jeffrey Linzer Sr., MD, FAAP, FACEP, Associate Medical Director for Compliance, Emergency Pediatric Group, Children's Healthcare of Atlanta at Egleston. This means you have to be on guard for nosebleed treatments that don't qualify as nosebleed repairs, for coding purposes. Standard nosebleed-stoppage methods include ice, pressure, or gauze. [...]
You’ve reached your limit of free articles. Already a subscriber? Log in.
Not a subscriber? Subscribe today to continue reading this article. Plus, you’ll get:
  • Simple explanations of current healthcare regulations and payer programs
  • Real-world reporting scenarios solved by our expert coders
  • Industry news, such as MAC and RAC activities, the OIG Work Plan, and CERT reports
  • Instant access to every article ever published in your eNewsletter
  • 6 annual AAPC-approved CEUs*
  • The latest updates for CPT®, ICD-10-CM, HCPCS Level II, NCCI edits, modifiers, compliance, technology, practice management, and more
*CEUs available with select eNewsletters.