Practice Management Alert

Reader Question:

Look at Service Date Before Appending Modifier 59

Question: A patient presented for a colectomy for colon cancer. The physician also discovered that the patient had a ventral incarcerated hernia that required a complex repair using mesh. Because of the separate work, we reported 44140 and then reported 49561 with modifier 59. The payer denied the claim. Were we wrong to append modifier 59? Mississippi Subscriber Answer: You might think you can append modifier 59 (Distinct procedural service) to the hernia repair code and bill it separately. After all, the hernia repair seems to qualify as a different reason for surgery than the colectomy -- for example, if the patient has a recurrent hernia. But modifier 59 tells the payer the hernia repair happened at a separate session, which isn't true in your case. If the physician's documentation proves justification, you might try appending modifier 22 (Unusual procedural services) to the colectomy code because of the extra complexity, time, [...]
You’ve reached your limit of free articles. Already a subscriber? Log in.
Not a subscriber? Subscribe today to continue reading this article. Plus, you’ll get:
  • Simple explanations of current healthcare regulations and payer programs
  • Real-world reporting scenarios solved by our expert coders
  • Industry news, such as MAC and RAC activities, the OIG Work Plan, and CERT reports
  • Instant access to every article ever published in Revenue Cycle Insider
  • 6 annual AAPC-approved CEUs
  • The latest updates for CPT®, ICD-10-CM, HCPCS Level II, NCCI edits, modifiers, compliance, technology, practice management, and more

Other Articles in this issue of

Practice Management Alert

View All