Advanced Search

Practice Management Alert

Reader Question:

Downcoding Is Just As Bad As Upcoding

Published on Tue Jul 12, 2011

Question: Texas Medicaid only will authorize a PET neck to mid thigh (78815) and will not authorize a PET whole body scan (78816). When the patient actually had the PET he was self pay at that time but because of multiple medical bills became eligible for Medicaid and Medicaid will only authorize the 78815. I think some reimbursement would be better than none, but am leery of down coding. Is there something wrong in billing a lesser code even though you actually performed a higher code?Texas SubscriberAnswer: You should not be downcoding, especially just for reimbursement sake. You should not choose the codes you bill based on the reimbursement you expect to get. You need to report the codes that accurately reflect the work the physician did and the services or procedures the patient had.If an auditor reviews your records and determines that you're deliberately downcoding claims, they'll conclude that [...]
You’ve reached your limit of free articles. Already a subscriber? Log in.
Not a subscriber? Subscribe today to continue reading this article. Plus, you’ll get:
  • Simple explanations of current healthcare regulations and payer programs
  • Real-world reporting scenarios solved by our expert coders
  • Industry news, such as MAC and RAC activities, the OIG Work Plan, and CERT reports
  • Instant access to every article ever published in your eNewsletter
  • 6 annual AAPC-approved CEUs*
  • The latest updates for CPT®, ICD-10-CM, HCPCS Level II, NCCI edits, modifiers, compliance, technology, practice management, and more
*CEUs available with select eNewsletters.

Other Articles in this issue of

Practice Management Alert

View All