Question: A podiatrist performed two osteotomies on the patient's right foot -- one on the second metatarsal, and one on the third metatarsal. I don't know whether to report 28299 for a double osteotomy, 28309 for multiple osteotomies, or whether I should just report 28308 twice. And if I report 28308 twice, do I need modifier 59? North Carolina Subscriber Answer: First, you need more details on the nature of the procedure. Most likely, you can scratch 28299 (Correction, hallux valgus [bunion], with or without sesamoidectomy; by double osteotomy) because your podiatrist's procedure is not a hallux valgus correction and doesn't fit under any of CPT's hallux valgus correction codes. A hallux valgus correction would involve an osteotomy of the first metatarsal -- not of the second and third. And a "double osteotomy," according to 28299, means that the doctor did two osteotomies on the same metatarsal, not two separate metatarsals. Because your op note fits the description of an osteotomy that did not involve lengthening, shortening or angular correction of the metatarsals, you can safely choose between 28308 (Osteotomy, with or without lengthening, shortening or angular correction, metatarsal; other than first metatarsal, each) and 28309 (... multiple [e.g., Swanson type cavus foot procedure]). Already, this discrepancy brings up the point that you should verify the reason for the surgery and accompanying diagnosis codes. But the best answer with the evidence you have is to use 28308 twice, append modifier 59 (Distinct procedural service) on the second code and send in an op note to verify the modifier. Reason: