If excessive fat is making it hard to get to the foot's structures, you may have a case for reporting increased procedural services. If you overuse modifier 22 (Increased procedural services) your podiatry practice may wind up facing scrutiny -- or worse -- from your payers or even the Office of Inspector General (OIG). But if you avoid the modifier entirely, you're likely missing out on reimbursement your podiatrist deserves. How it works: Take a look at these three myths -- and the realities -- to ensure you don't fall victim to the modifier 22 catch-22. Myth #1: Morbid Obesity Means Automatic 22 While morbid obesity is sometimes an appropriate reason to use modifier 22, it's not appropriate to assume that just because the patient is morbidly obese you can append modifier 22. "Modifier 22 is about extra procedural work and, although morbid obesity might lead to extra work, it is not enough in itself," says Marcella Bucknam, CPC, CCS-P, CPC-H, CCS, CPC-P, COBGC, CCC, manager of compliance education for the University of Washington Physicians Compliance Program in Seattle. "Unless time is significant or the intensity of the procedure is increased due to the obesity, then modifier 22 should not be appended," warns Maggie Mac, CPC, CEMC, CHC, CMM, ICCE, director of best practices -- network operations at Mount Sinai Hospital in New York City. There are some scenarios where you usually should be considering whether modifier 22 is appropriate -- such as reoperations, unusual body habitus (obesity, unusually thin, tall, short, etc.), altered anatomy (congenital or due to trauma or previous surgery), and very extensive injury or disease -- but do not automatically append modifier 22 without the documentation to back it up. You'll only be able to append modifier 22 when a procedure requires substantially greater additional time or effort because of the patient's obesity. Check the notes: "Although you can (in theory) add modifier 22 based only on the description of the work in the body of the note, practically it is impossible to get paid if you don't quantify the extra effort," Bucknam warns. Example: Don't forget: Myth #2: A Little Extra Time Means Extra Pay "CPT does not provide specific direction as to the specific amount of time and/or percentage increase of time or work required to compliantly report modifier 22," says Marvel J. Hammer, RN, CPC, CHCO, president of MJH Consulting in Denver. The typical rule of thumb, however, is your physician must spend at least 50 percent more time and/or put in at least 50 percent more effort than normal for you to append modifier 22. "There should be documentation of at least a 50 percent increase in work and/or time to justify use of modifier 22," Bucknam confirms. "Twice as much is better." Pointer: Caution: Detail matters: Bottom line: Myth #3: Assume Lysis of Adhesions Warrants 22 You can't assume lysis of average adhesions always merits modifier 22. "Lysis of adhesions is inherent in most procedures, particularly after a previous surgery," Mac says. The mere presence of adhesions does not mean you can use modifier 22, however. "Everyone has adhesions and there is an expectation that you will lyse them when you encounter them during surgery," Bucknam agrees. "But when the adhesions are dense due to previous surgeries or chronic disease, that's when you're looking at modifier 22 work." In fact: On the other hand, when adhesions are dense, vascular, anatomy-distorting, and require extensive work to remove, the payer may consider payment. In those cases, you should append modifier 22 to the primary procedure rather than listing the lysis code separately (such as 28225, Tenolysis, extensor, foot; single tendon) because of bundling issues.