Avoid poor excision documentation leading to $355.79 loss. Diagnosis: Procedure: Question: Since the procedure was similar to treating an exostosis, 28104 seems to be the best choice, says Deb Carr, CCS, a coder with a private billing company who resides in Sunbury, Pa. "I am looking at this as an excision off the bone." The documentation is not indicating that the podiatrist split the periosteum or repaired the periosteum at the end of the case. On the other hand, he treated a protuberance of bone, and the protuberance originated from something, says Carr. Let Documentation Rules Guide Code Choice "This op report is missing so much information that it is difficult to code anything," comments Arnold Beresh, DPM, CPC, of Peninsula Foot and Ankle Specialists PLC in Hampton, Va. "There is no mention of a tumor [and] it does not mention what bones where worked on." With no mention of tumor, 28171 is an unlikely solution, says Carr. Heterotrophic bone diagnosis in conjunction with Charcot normally involves soft tissue aberrant bone. The podiatrist in the case study, however, seems to be describing something different in his op report. Because the op report states midfoot, "I picked metatarsal as the site of the excision," explains Carr. "I ended up coding it 28104." "I agree with 28104," comments Anthony Poggio, DPM, in Alameda, Calif. The perisosteum repair (or not) would be included in the allowance for the bone removal and not payable separately. Similarly any "rasping" or "contouring" would also be included in the exostectomy code, Poggio states. Caveat: Wish for missed $355.79 Unfortunately, using 28104 for this case may be undercoding, says Paul Fehring, owner of Drs. Billing Inc., a podiatry-specific billing service in Fairfield, Ohio. CPT 28171 describes a "radical resection" and has more relative value units (RVUs) at 22.54, while 28104, excising a bone cyst or benign tumor, carries just 12.68 RVUs. The notes are vague, but it sounds like the podiatrist took out a "fairly large mass" and the work is a bit complicated, Fehring notes. The op note, however, requires more details, Fehring says, such as exactly which bones were worked on and the precise location of the mass. If you could be sure that the bones worked on were not the talus or calcaneus, 28171 may be the correct choice, Fehring says. To code 28171, you would also need a pathology report stating that the mass the podiatrist removed was in fact a tumor, benign or otherwise, adds Poggio. The op note should also define what "radical" means, Poggio says, for instance, "was one-quarter of the bone removed? Onehalf? Three-quarters?" Set Documentation Ducks in a Row "If nothing else, this op report can also be a reminder to the docs to give good documentation," comments Carr. "We coders have to read between the lines more often than we'd like to." Working for a billing company, I "do not have access to the docs to ask them questions about their documentation," says Carr, "if it's really poor documentation we ask for an addendum." An op report, says Beresh, should have at the minimum the following items: Within the op report, the physician should also note that he took time out to identify the patient, the extremity the procedure was to be performed on, the procedure to be performed, and the type of pre-op antibiotic, continues Beresh. Additionally, the report should include other details, adds Beresh, such as: