Pediatric Coding Alert

Reader Questions:

Clarify 'New' Versus 'Established' Patient

Question: Our practice performed a test on a patient another doctor referred to us. Our physician was not present for the procedure; a technician administered the test. Should I consider this patient an established patient when she returns for additional care?Mississippi SubscriberAnswer: No, you should consider the patient "new" until a face-to-face encounter with your physician occurs. If the primary physician (or another physician billing under the same group number) provided a non-face-to-face service for a patient and then provided a face-to-face service within three years, you should still consider the patient to be "new" when selecting an E/M service code for the face-to-face service.According to AMA guidelines, there are additional factors to consider as well:The three-year rule is a well-established rule for "new" versus "established" patients. That is, if any physician within a given practice has a face-to-face visit with a patient within a 36-month period, that patient is [...]
You’ve reached your limit of free articles. Already a subscriber? Log in.
Not a subscriber? Subscribe today to continue reading this article. Plus, you’ll get:
  • Simple explanations of current healthcare regulations and payer programs
  • Real-world reporting scenarios solved by our expert coders
  • Industry news, such as MAC and RAC activities, the OIG Work Plan, and CERT reports
  • Instant access to every article ever published in Revenue Cycle Insider
  • 6 annual AAPC-approved CEUs
  • The latest updates for CPT®, ICD-10-CM, HCPCS Level II, NCCI edits, modifiers, compliance, technology, practice management, and more

Other Articles in this issue of

Pediatric Coding Alert

View All

Which Codify by AAPC tool is right for you?

Call 844-334-2816 to speak with a Codify by AAPC specialist now.