Pediatric Coding Alert

2 Wart Removal Notes Help You Identify Separate E/M

Charge 9921x-25 when these elements stand on their own The next time you're staring at a wart removal chart and debating whether you should also code an office visit, try this litmus test.

If you can highlight a significant, separate service from the wart removal, report an E/M service - and appeal any denials. 

Read the following two entries and decide which one warrants an office visit code.

Hint: Code an established patient office visit plus lesion destruction when you meet these criteria:

1. Documentation contains two of three elements - history, evaluation and/or  medical decision-making

2. These elements are significant and separately identifiable from 17000. Report Procedure-Focused Notes as 17000 Chart 1: A 15-year-old male comes in complaining of a wart. The plantar wart is small - 3 centimeters in diameter. I use liquid nitrogen to remove the wart. Give patient postsurgery instructions. Answer 1: In this scenario, you should not report an E/M code (such as CPT 99212 -99215, Office or other outpatient visit for the evaluation and management of an established patient) in addition to the wart removal (17000, Destruction [e.g., laser surgery, electrosurgery, cryosurgery, chemosurgery, surgical curettement], all benign or premalignant lesions [e.g., actinic keratoses] other than skin tags or cutaneous vascular proliferative lesions; first lesion]; linked to 078.19, Other specified viral warts).

"The pediatrician doesn't perform a history, evaluation and medical decision-making separate from the procedure," says Steven M. Verno, CMBSI, CMMC, CMMB, NREMTP, compliance director with the Medical Association of Billers. You can't justify 99212-99215 because the physician doesn't perform a separately identifiable E/M service. Code 2 Separate Elements With E/M Chart 2: A 12-year-old male presents with complaint of a bump on his foot. He has had the lesion for six months. He has pain when walking and playing sports. The lesion feels better after the patient soaks in the bath tub. Wart has no edema, is 2 cm in diameter and depth, with no redness and no infection. I recommend removal of benign lesion with LO2.

I apply LO2 to remove the lesion. Instruct patient on postsurgery care.

Answer 2: You should code chart two's notes as 9921x-25 and 17000. "When the pediatrician performs a separate history, examination and medical decision-making, you should code the E/M," says Barbara J. Cobuzzi, MBA, CPC, ChBME, CPC-H, president of Cash Flow Solutions Inc. in Brick, N.J.

"I'd probably report 99212-25 in addition to 17000 for such a scenario," Verno says.
 
Dispel Single-Diagnosis Myth Despite rumors, two diagnoses - such as 382.00 (Acute suppurative otitis media without spontaneous rupture of eardrum) and 078.19 - aren't necessary to bill an E/M in addition to wart removal. "More than one diagnosis will help support a separate E/M, but anytime the pediatrician performs and documents a significant, separate E/M apart [...]
You’ve reached your limit of free articles. Already a subscriber? Log in.
Not a subscriber? Subscribe today to continue reading this article. Plus, you’ll get:
  • Simple explanations of current healthcare regulations and payer programs
  • Real-world reporting scenarios solved by our expert coders
  • Industry news, such as MAC and RAC activities, the OIG Work Plan, and CERT reports
  • Instant access to every article ever published in your eNewsletter
  • 6 annual AAPC-approved CEUs*
  • The latest updates for CPT®, ICD-10-CM, HCPCS Level II, NCCI edits, modifiers, compliance, technology, practice management, and more
*CEUs available with select eNewsletters.

Other Articles in this issue of

Pediatric Coding Alert

View All