Stick to skin-origin codes regardless of depth or size. No one's happy reporting a skin code when the pathologist examines a large, cancerous skin specimen that has spread to subcutaneous tissue and requires margin evaluation. Those examinations are more work -- so can you use a musculoskeletal code that pays more? Find the answer as you read on to make sure that you understand the skin-code boundaries. You'll also learn one little trick that might ethically earn your pathologist more pay for those difficult skin specimens. Focus on 3 Skin Codes Regardless of size, depth, or neoplastic status, CPT® provides only the following three codes to describe skin-specimen pathology services: Distinguish the three codes by determining if the skin specimen is: As long as the operative note indicates that the surgeon removed a skin specimen and the pathologist's findings indicate normal skin or abnormalities that originate in the skin, you'll need to turn to these codes. Coder tip: In other words, the answer to our leading question is "no," you should not use a musculoskeletal code (such as 88307, Level V - Surgical pathology, gross and microscopic examination, soft tissue mass [except lipoma] - biopsy/simple excision), that pays more when the lesion extends into subcutaneous tissue. Let Modifier 22 Work for Additional Pay You should never upcode a skin specimen to 88307 because of cancer diagnosis, extreme depth or size, or an unusually difficult and time consuming pathology exam, such as a melanoma specimen requiring margin evaluation. Opportunity: Make sure you provide documentation explaining the unusual circumstances surrounding the procedure. This could include items such as the pathology report, a narrative describing the unusual nature of the procedure, a statement of the time involved relative to the typical time for the procedure, etc. Your documentation must demonstrate medical necessity and the procedure's unusual difficulty.