Pathology/Lab Coding Alert

Reader Questions:

Let Pathologist Judge Unlisted Anal Specimen

Question: Our pathologist received two distinctly identified anal condylomata and an anal biopsy from the lateral anal verge, as well as one from the proximal denate line for anal intraepithelial neoplasia evaluation. Should we code 88304 or 88305? Minnesota Subscriber Answer: Depending on your pathologist's documentation, this example might justify reporting four units of 88305 (Level IV -- Surgical pathology, gross and microscopic examination...). Because these are unlisted specimens, you should code according to your pathologist's judgment of the amount of work that each specimen requires. Based on the documentation that the pathologist receives four distinctly identified anal specimens, you should code each one individually. The only listed anus specimen for pathology is 88304 (Level III -- Surgical pathology, gross and microscopic examination, anus, tag). Because the specimens you describe are for evaluation for cancer or pre-cancerous changes, your pathologist might find the work associated with the evaluation similar to a biopsy [...]
You’ve reached your limit of free articles. Already a subscriber? Log in.
Not a subscriber? Subscribe today to continue reading this article. Plus, you’ll get:
  • Simple explanations of current healthcare regulations and payer programs
  • Real-world reporting scenarios solved by our expert coders
  • Industry news, such as MAC and RAC activities, the OIG Work Plan, and CERT reports
  • Instant access to every article ever published in Revenue Cycle Insider
  • 6 annual AAPC-approved CEUs
  • The latest updates for CPT®, ICD-10-CM, HCPCS Level II, NCCI edits, modifiers, compliance, technology, practice management, and more

Other Articles in this issue of

Pathology/Lab Coding Alert

View All