Pathology/Lab Coding Alert

Reader Question:

Scrutinize TC Denials Following 'Grandfather' Expiration

Question: Since the TC Grandfather Provision ended July 1, 2012, we're receiving approximately six denials per week from our Medicare contractor for anatomic pathology services for non-hospital patients. For example, a Medicare patient went to a physician's office and had a skin lesion removed. Our pathology lab received the skin specimen, processed it, and reported back to the physician. We billed 88305, but received a denial indicating "not a covered service -- Must bill to part A contractor." Our Medicare representative told us that the patient received another service on the same day as a hospital outpatient (place of service 22). That made our global 88305 claim deny, as though we were charging the technical component (TC) for a hospital outpatient. Is there a modifier we can use, such as 59, to indicate that our service was for a non-hospital patient? Arkansas Subscriber Answer: Unfortunately, no, there is not a modifier [...]
You’ve reached your limit of free articles. Already a subscriber? Log in.
Not a subscriber? Subscribe today to continue reading this article. Plus, you’ll get:
  • Simple explanations of current healthcare regulations and payer programs
  • Real-world reporting scenarios solved by our expert coders
  • Industry news, such as MAC and RAC activities, the OIG Work Plan, and CERT reports
  • Instant access to every article ever published in Revenue Cycle Insider
  • 6 annual AAPC-approved CEUs
  • The latest updates for CPT®, ICD-10-CM, HCPCS Level II, NCCI edits, modifiers, compliance, technology, practice management, and more

Other Articles in this issue of

Pathology/Lab Coding Alert

View All