Pathology/Lab Coding Alert
Reader Question:
Ignore 'Direct' or 'Indirect' for Immunofluorescence Studies
Published on Tue Dec 08, 2015
You’ve reached your limit of free articles. Already a subscriber? Log in.
Not a subscriber? Subscribe today to continue reading this article. Plus, you’ll get:
Related Articles
Other Articles in this issue of
Pathology/Lab Coding Alert
- Cervical Cancer Screening:
Update Your HPV Testing Protocol
Every five years passes CMS muster. If your lab is stuck in the biennial Pap/reflex [...] - PAMA Action:
Meet the Proposed CLFS Pricing Rule
Lab reporting starts January 1. Finally — the rule for re-valuing the Clinical Laboratory Fee [...] - ICD-10:
Keep Up the Good Work -- Smooth Transition Underway
CMS reports 90 percent claims acceptance rate Maybe the sky didn’t fall when we transitioned [...] - Reader Question:
Don't Double Dip for Lab Method
Question: Our lab performs a procedure to assay non-drug analytes that involves column chromatography plus mass spectrometry. Should [...] - Reader Question:
Pay Attention to ICD-10 Combination Codes
Question: Our lab performed a culture ordered for a patient with a diagnosis of sepsis, and [...] - Reader Question:
Zero In on Lipid Order for Proper Coding
Question: A physician ordered cardiovascular lipid panel screening. How should I code the work? Oregon Subscriber [...] - Reader Question:
Ignore 'Direct' or 'Indirect' for Immunofluorescence Studies
Question: I understand that coding for immunofluorescence studies to aid in the diagnosis of conditions such [...] - Reader Question:
Look for SSN Protection
Question: I’ve heard that Medicare is removing the patient’s Social Security Number (SSN) from their Medicare [...] - You Be the Coder:
Check Out This Lung Case
Question: Our pathologist evaluated a frozen section of a lung wedge biopsy during surgery, and later [...]
View All
