Pathology/Lab Coding Alert
Reader Question:
Forget Professional Component DOS Instruction
Published on Mon Feb 12, 2018
You’ve reached your limit of free articles. Already a subscriber? Log in.
Not a subscriber? Subscribe today to continue reading this article. Plus, you’ll get:
Related Articles
Other Articles in this issue of
Pathology/Lab Coding Alert
- CPT® 2018:
Transform Bone Marrow Reporting With New, Revised Codes
Pay heed to new CCI instruction, too. When you report your pathologist's bone marrow cases [...] - ICD-10:
Sharpen Your HIV/AIDS Coding With this Quiz
Patient welfare and medical necessity are at stake. Maybe your lab is reporting results related [...] - ICD-10 Coding Quiz:
Compare Your Answers to the Experts'
Don't give mistaken AIDS diagnosis. Making errors when reporting human immunodeficiency virus, acquired immunodeficiency syndrome [...] - You Be the Coder:
Avoid Molecular Pathology Modifier Mix-Up
Question: We've recently started billing molecular pathology cases for pathologists. There's a debate in our [...] - Reader Question:
Check Out Endometrial Hyperplasia Details
Question: I've been coding endometrial hyperplasia as N85.0, but a coder friend tells me that [...] - Reader Question:
Use ABN Modifier for Non-Covered Flow Cytometry
Question: We recently had flow cytometry charges denied by Medicare for "diagnosis not medically necessary." [...] - Reader Question:
Don't Unbundle Alcian Blue/PAS
Question: What's the correct way to code an Alcian Blue/PAS stain to rule out Barrett's [...] - Reader Question:
Forget Professional Component DOS Instruction
Question: I heard that Medicare issued a memo that we must bill the pathologist's professional [...]
View All
