Pathology/Lab Coding Alert
Reader Question:
Avoid 'Insufficient' Diagnosis Terminology
Published on Fri Jun 06, 2014
You’ve reached your limit of free articles. Already a subscriber? Log in.
Not a subscriber? Subscribe today to continue reading this article. Plus, you’ll get:
Other Articles in this issue of
Pathology/Lab Coding Alert
- Microbiology:
Dominate Infectious Agent Antigen Coding With These 5 Tips
Reporting 87260-87902 just got easier. Only a couple of small changes infected the CPT® 2014 [...] - CPT® 2014:
1 Code + 1 Phrase = Microbiology Changes You Need to Know
Reverse transcription not required. Now that you’ve refreshed your memory on how to code infectious [...] - ICD-10:
Hierarchy Scrambles Hepatitis C Codes
Acute/chronic distinction will lead in ICD-10. You’ll have the same number of codes and nearly [...] - Surgical Pathology:
Know When to 'Unbundle' Thyroidectomy
Don’t lose $71 that your pathologist deserves. Here’s something that doesn’t happen every day — [...] - ICD-10 Implementation:
Check Out This CMS Update
ICD-9 update in question, too. You might have more questions than answers about the ICD-10 [...] - Reader Question:
Avoid 'Insufficient' Diagnosis Terminology
Question: For an FNA evaluation, the pathologist wrote a final diagnosis of “insufficient for evaluation.” But [...] - Reader Question:
Check 3 Rs for Interpretation
Question: When our lab performs a serum protein electhrophoresis and quantifies the fractions, can we bill [...] - Reader Question:
Distinguish Wet Mount, Other Vaginal Tests
Question: The lab receives a vaginal fluid specimen for an “amines” test. Is this the same [...] - Reader Question:
Immunohistochemistry Depends on Method
Question: The lab report states, “progesterone receptor negative: 0 staining in all cells. Should we bill [...] - You Be the Coder:
Choose FISH as PhD or MD Service
Question: If we perform FISH aneuploidy +13, +18, +21, X, Y for a paraffin-embedded tissue specimen [...]
View All
