Pathology/Lab Coding Alert

CCI Says:

Choose Only 1 Flow Cytometry Interpretation Code

Take this modifier 59 check-up, too. Selecting just one code from 88187-88189 for your pathologist's flow cytometry panel interpretation has always been correct coding. Now Medicare's Correct Coding Initiative (CCI) gets in on the act to enforce that rule. Navigate Your Way Around 88184-88189 Pathologists use the flow cytometry codes (88184-88189) for immunophenotyping of hematolymphoid cancers -- often as an adjunct test for surgical pathology specimens. The flow cytometry testing involves panels of "markers" that require interpretation by the pathologist. For the technical work involved in performing the test panel, report the following codes:
- 88184 -- Flow cytometry, cell surface, cytoplasmic, or nuclear marker, technical component only; first marker - +88185 -- each additional marker (List separately in addition to code for first marker). In addition to always reporting 88184, you should list multiple units of 88185 based on the number of markers beyond the first marker in the panel. Interpretation is separate: Based on the number of markers in the panel, you should choose only one of the following codes to describe the pathologist's interpretation: - 88187 -- Flow cytometry, interpretation; 2 to 8 markers - 88188 -- 9 to 15 markers - 88189 -- 16 or more markers. These codes are not additive. For example, you should not list 88187 for the first eight markers, plus 88188 for markers number nine through 15. "You should select one code to describe the interpretation of all flow cytometry markers for a single specimen," says Peggy Slagle, CPC, billing compliance coordinator at the University of Nebraska Medical Center in Omaha. For instance: If the panel has nine markers or 13 markers, you should select 88188 for the interpretation. If the panel has 18 markers, select 88189. Watch for edit pairs: CCI version 14.3, effective Oct. 1, bundles 88187 as a component of 88188 and 88189, and also bundles 88188 as a component of 88189. That means you can't report any of the codes together, but should instead select the most comprehensive code that describes the number of markers in the single panel. If you bill two of these codes, CMS will deny the lesser code anyway. Know How to Use Modifier 59 If you can document that your pathologist performed two bundled procedures and how medical necessity for the service, you might be able to override the CCI edit pair. Here's how: According to CMS instruction, you should append modifier 59 (Distinct procedural service) to "the secondary, additional, or lesser procedure(s) or service(s)" to indicate that you performed two separate procedures. But even with proper documentation, you can't always use modifier 59. Here's why: The CCI edit table has a "modifier indicator" column. If the codes you-re trying to report together have an indicator of "1" next to them, [...]
You’ve reached your limit of free articles. Already a subscriber? Log in.
Not a subscriber? Subscribe today to continue reading this article. Plus, you’ll get:
  • Simple explanations of current healthcare regulations and payer programs
  • Real-world reporting scenarios solved by our expert coders
  • Industry news, such as MAC and RAC activities, the OIG Work Plan, and CERT reports
  • Instant access to every article ever published in Revenue Cycle Insider
  • 6 annual AAPC-approved CEUs
  • The latest updates for CPT®, ICD-10-CM, HCPCS Level II, NCCI edits, modifiers, compliance, technology, practice management, and more