Removing drugs from formula would help avoid steep cuts The letter to CMS Administrator Mark McClellan also states that Thomas and Johnson are looking forward to working with CMS on devising financial incentives for physicians to improve their outcomes and adopt information technology.
Avoiding an estimated 31 percent pay cut for physicians from 2006 to 2012 would be "prohibitively expensive," two influential legislators warn.
Unless the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services acts to fix the Sustainable Growth Rate (SGR) formula for physician payment updates, Congress will be unable to avert the roughly 5 percent annual cuts over the next seven years, warn Rep. Bill Thomas (R-CA) and Nancy Johnson (R-CT), chairs of the House Ways & Means Committee and Health Subcommittee respectively, in a July 12 letter to CMS.
CMS could do two things to adjust the assumptions in the SGR, and therefore rescuing physician payments appear less expensive, say Thomas and Johnson:
Separately, the influential Congressional Research Service says Congress may want to consider "technical modifications" to the Average Sales Price methodology for pricing Medicare Part B drugs. Congress may also want to look at revising the controversial Competitive Acquisition Program for Part B drugs, in a report called "Medicare: Payments for Covered Part B Prescription Drugs" (RL31419).
The report notes that oncologists have reported difficulty in obtaining drugs at the new ASP plus six percent levels. But the CRS analyst also notes that CMS has promised to monitor "any shifts or changes in utilization patterns."