Part B Insider (Multispecialty) Coding Alert
Docs Kissed Nearly $1 Billion Goodbye In 2004
But the AMA doesn't want to tinker with E/M coding again
You could be losing thousands of dollars every year due to downcoded evaluation & management codes - and there's no relief in sight.
The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services said most of the $1 billion in underpayments in 2004 came from physician visits. CMS performed a special undercoding study as part of its 2004 report on the Comprehensive Error Rate Testing program, issued in December (see PBI, Vol. 6, no. 1). Meanwhile, E/M visits also account for a significant amount of downcoding.
In the CERT report, CMS said it would ask the American Medical Association "to improve existing clinical examples and other documentation guidelines" to improve E/M coding.
But the AMA said, "no thanks." The AMA's House of Delegates passed a resolution calling on CMS to conduct its own pilot studies on using clinical examples to guide E/M coding. The AMA and specialty societies already did their own pilot projects last May and found less than encouraging results (see PBI, Vol.5, no. 23).
The best-performing specialty in last May's clinical examples pilot project had an accuracy rate of only 44 percent, and the worst-performing specialty scored only 26 percent, the AMA says. This result came after the AMA and specialty societies invested a lot of money and energy in developing the examples and getting physicians involved.
After that dismal failure, the AMA isn't interested in investing more money in the project, an AMA spokesperson says. If CMS wants to keep the clinical-examples train rolling, it'll have to shovel its own coal. Meanwhile, the CPT Editorial Panel will continue to develop a more viable option for E/M coding.
Even though the "clinical examples" pilot project failed to achieve accurate coding, it also showed that the vast majority of times, the physicians were coding within one level of the correct level, and about half the time they were coding too low.
The AMA also resolved to educate physicians about E/M coding, and CMS said it would encourage the carriers to provide more education.
Part B Insider (Multispecialty) Coding Alert
- Evaluation & Management:
Docs Kissed Nearly $1 Billion Goodbye In 2004
But the AMA doesn't want to tinker with E/M coding again
You could be [...] - New Codes:
Open Door Laminoplasty Code Still Leaves Open Questions
CPT Codes 2005 includes two new spinal surgery codes, but an important new technique is [...] - CMS Seeks Ethnic Cancer Care Proposals
The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services posted a new $25 million demonstration project inviting [...] - Downcoding:
You Could Be Selling Yourself Short 14.4 Percent Of The Time
For 14.4 percent of claims processed by the carriers, the documentation supported a higher-paying code, [...] - What's One E/M Level Between Auditors?
When a physician upcodes or downcodes an evaluation and management claim, most of the time [...] - New Codes:
CMS Gives An Extra 50 CM To Gastric Bypass Surgeons
The addition means fewer denials for procedures
Not only did CPT Codes [...] - Coverage:
Medicare Pumps Up Insulin Coverage
Older patients can now benefit from stem cell transplants
The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services [...] - Studies & Surveys:
No Easy Culprits For Skyrocketing Doc Costs, Report Says
Congress asked the Medicare Payments Advisory Commission to look into a couple of physician-related issues [...] - Part B Coding Coach:
Don't Drop The Ball When Doing Discharge Documentation
Use these 3 tips to improve your 99238 and 99239 reimbursement
Incorrectly using hospital discharge codes [...] - Physician Notes:
Physician Pay Formula Is Broke - Will Congress Fix It?
Don't hold your breath, say Washington insiders
To physicians, the danger is [...]
