Part B Insider (Multispecialty) Coding Alert
Quell Confusion About CMS' 30-Day Retrospective Billing Rule
If your head continues to spin over the new 30-day rule, we've got clarification straight from Medicare.
Effective this year, you'll be able to retroactively bill Medicare for services your physician rendered up to 30 days prior to the date of filing a Medicare enrollment application that a Medicare contractor subsequently approves.
As we reported in the
Insider (Vol. 10, No. 2), Jim Bossenmeyer of CMS' office of financial management said during a Jan. 13 CMS open door forum that the effective date of billing is the later of either the date of filing or the date the physician first starts to practice at the location.But several subscribers wrote in to the
Insider asking for further information on this new directive. For instance, Sylvia Cohn of Hill Medical Coding in Pittsburgh wrote, "After I read about the change to 30-day retrospective billing, I called my carrier and they said they are not implementing that rule. Why is that?"We went straight to the source and got the following information from a Medicare spokesperson:
"We have placed the following FAQ on the CMS Web site," Medicare's rep told the
Insider:Question:
What is the effective date of the enrollment provisions found in the CY 2009 Physician Fee Schedule (CMS-1403-FC)?Answer:
The effective date for provisions found in the CY 2009 Physician Fee Schedule is January 1, 2009 unless otherwise specified.Since CMS did not establish a delayed effective date for any changes in the Medicare provider enrollment provisions, the effective date of the enrollment provisions is also January 1, 2009.CMS is in the process of developing instructions for Medicare contractors regarding these new provisions ... CMS intends to phase in their enforcement of this provision and will begin actively monitoring provider compliance with this provision beginning on April 1, 2009."
Part B Insider (Multispecialty) Coding Alert
- PART B APPEALS:
CMS Changes Dollar Amount Threshold for U.S. Court Appeals
$1,220 must be in dispute to qualify for district court hearing. Forty dollars may not [...] - ENROLLMENT:
Quell Confusion About CMS' 30-Day Retrospective Billing Rule
If your head continues to spin over the new 30-day rule, we've got clarification straight [...] - PART B REVENUE BOOSTER:
Co-Surgery or Assistant Surgery? The Difference Could Cost You 46 Percent of Your Pay
Keep an eye out for separate op notes, experts say. Can't tell a surgical assist [...] - COMPLIANCE:
6 Ways to Head Off Compliance Problems --and Lawsuits
How carefully do you listen to your employees' complaints? A hospice chain's $25 million settlement [...] - READER QUESTION:
Differentiate Glaucoma Patient Coding Rules Based on Whether SNF Is Involved
If the patient comes to your practice from a skilled nursing facility, consolidated billing rules [...] - Part B Coding Coach:
Affect Your Practice's Bottom Line With Nosebleed Repair Smarts
Coders often under-report their epistaxis claims. If you can't differentiate a complex anterior nosebleed repair [...] - PHYSICIAN NOTES:
If Your Modifier JW Claims Resulted in Instant Rejections, Don't Lose Heart
Plus: CMS offers quick primer on billing/coding services performed in ambulatory surgical centers. You may [...] - In other news ...• Need a quick primer on how to appropriately report your ambulatory surgical center (ASC) services? CMS provides a lot of information in a new brief factsheet about ASC billing.
The document, which was updated in January, outlines the requirements that a facility must meet [...]
